PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-19.09%13.90%60.92%187.21%-56.66%
3AMZ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC
-30.92%-38.43%110.82%268.28%-81.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3QQQ.L achieves a -19.09% return, which is significantly higher than 3AMZ.L's -30.92% return.


3QQQ.L

1D
8.72%
1M
-10.76%
YTD
-19.09%
6M
-16.94%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
38.88%
5Y*
10Y*

3AMZ.L

1D
8.12%
1M
3.90%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-27.26%
1Y
-23.89%
3Y*
27.92%
5Y*
-26.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3QQQ.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than 3AMZ.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

3AMZ.L
3AMZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
3AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3QQQ.L3AMZ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

-0.23

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.39

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.05

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

-0.40

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.62

-0.85

+2.48

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the 3AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3QQQ.L and 3AMZ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3QQQ.L3AMZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.23

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.18

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and 3AMZ.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3QQQ.L nor 3AMZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, smaller than the maximum 3AMZ.L drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3QQQ.L and 3AMZ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3QQQ.L3AMZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.93%

-96.67%

+37.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

-60.08%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.24%

-88.59%

+46.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-69.46%

+48.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.13%

27.80%

-6.67%

Volatility

3QQQ.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) is 16.78%, while Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) has a volatility of 28.39%. This indicates that 3QQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3AMZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3QQQ.L3AMZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.78%

28.39%

-11.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.33%

80.30%

-26.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.29%

105.56%

-35.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.86%

105.49%

-41.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.86%

104.68%

-40.82%