PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities (3GLE.L) and WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3GLE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities
15.57%188.93%67.78%16.46%-12.50%
3SIL.L
WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged
-47.87%692.77%16.75%-30.27%18.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GLE.L achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly higher than 3SIL.L's -47.87% return.


3GLE.L

1D
9.74%
1M
-30.66%
YTD
15.57%
6M
45.19%
1Y
115.26%
3Y*
76.20%
5Y*
10Y*

3SIL.L

1D
7.19%
1M
-42.14%
YTD
-47.87%
6M
30.77%
1Y
171.11%
3Y*
53.28%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
3.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GLE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than 3SIL.L's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GLE.L
3GLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
3GLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

3SIL.L
3SIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
3SIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities (3GLE.L) and WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GLE.L3SIL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.03

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

2.13

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.87

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.39

4.80

+2.59

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the 3SIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GLE.L and 3SIL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GLE.L3SIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.03

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

-0.21

+1.29

Correlation

The correlation between 3GLE.L and 3SIL.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GLE.L nor 3SIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GLE.L drawdown since its inception was -49.48%, smaller than the maximum 3SIL.L drawdown of -99.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GLE.L and 3SIL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3GLE.L3SIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.48%

-99.33%

+49.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.48%

-89.36%

+39.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.02%

-94.97%

+59.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-94.33%

+82.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

34.90%

-19.11%

Volatility

3GLE.L vs. 3SIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities (3GLE.L) is 35.01%, while WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L) has a volatility of 58.12%. This indicates that 3GLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3SIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3GLE.L3SIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.01%

58.12%

-23.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.70%

172.58%

-99.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.37%

165.59%

-85.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.39%

106.06%

-52.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.39%

93.41%

-40.02%