2018.HK vs. 9618.HK

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (2018.HK) and Jd Com Inc (9618.HK).

Performance

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (2018.HK) and Jd Com Inc (9618.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2018.HK achieves a -13.13% return, which is significantly lower than 9618.HK's 0.27% return.

2018.HK

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: -13.13%
• 6M: -26.54%
• 1Y: -17.54%
• 3Y*: 21.64%
• 5Y*: -2.51%
• 10Y*: -4.20%

9618.HK

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 15.42%
• YTD: 0.27%
• 6M: -20.19%
• 1Y: -25.21%
• 3Y*: -10.97%
• 5Y*: -18.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
2018.HK AAC Technologies Holdings Inc	-13.13%	4.66%	62.30%	30.99%	-42.08%	-27.98%	-0.82%
9618.HK Jd Com Inc	0.27%	-15.81%	24.29%	-48.17%	-17.72%	-19.88%	46.15%

Correlation

The correlation between 2018.HK and 9618.HK is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.

Return for Risk

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2018.HK

2018.HK Risk / Return Rank: 15
2018.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
2018.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
2018.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 18
2018.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
2018.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 13

9618.HK

9618.HK Risk / Return Rank: 12
9618.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
9618.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
9618.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 12
9618.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
9618.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (2018.HK) and Jd Com Inc (9618.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2018.HK	9618.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	-0.76	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	-0.96	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.88	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.73	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	-1.19	-0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2018.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is comparable to the 9618.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2018.HK and 9618.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2018.HK	9618.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	-0.76	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	-0.34	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	-0.20	+0.48

Drawdowns

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2018.HK drawdown since its inception was -93.37%, which is greater than 9618.HK's maximum drawdown of -79.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2018.HK and 9618.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	2018.HK	9618.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.37%	-79.44%	-13.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.44%	-35.20%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.98%	-76.14%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.48%	-70.58%	-8.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.94%	-49.78%	+9.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.89%	24.21%	-2.32%

Volatility

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Volatility Comparison

AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (2018.HK) has a higher volatility of 13.88% compared to Jd Com Inc (9618.HK) at 12.24%. This indicates that 2018.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 9618.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2018.HK	9618.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.88%	12.24%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.32%	22.03%	+5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.51%	38.96%	+12.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.49%	54.96%	-5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.99%	54.13%	-6.14%

Dividends

2018.HK vs. 9618.HK - Dividend Comparison

2018.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than 9618.HK's 3.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2018.HK AAC Technologies Holdings Inc	0.71%	0.62%	0.27%	0.52%	0.00%	1.30%	0.23%	2.10%	4.62%	1.13%	1.77%	1.90%
9618.HK Jd Com Inc	3.47%	3.48%	2.19%	2.16%	2.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials