PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
2015.HK vs. NIO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


2015.HKNIO
YTD Return-32.77%-50.50%
1Y Return10.01%-43.66%
Sharpe Ratio0.05-0.63
Daily Std Dev60.14%66.44%
Max Drawdown-67.21%-93.95%
Current Drawdown-46.34%-92.85%

Fundamentals


2015.HKNIO
Market CapHK$213.07B$8.03B
EPSHK$5.54-$1.72
PE Ratio17.6922.67
Revenue (TTM)HK$123.85B$55.62B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$8.79B$5.14B
EBITDA (TTM)HK$9.21B-$19.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between 2015.HK and NIO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

2015.HK vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 2015.HK achieves a -32.77% return, which is significantly higher than NIO's -50.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-29.11%
-39.67%
2015.HK
NIO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Li Auto Inc

NIO Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2015.HK vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2015.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.30
NIO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NIO, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NIO, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NIO, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NIO, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NIO, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.97

2015.HK vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2015.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 2015.HK and NIO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.12
-0.68
2015.HK
NIO

Dividends

2015.HK vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2015.HK nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

2015.HK vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2015.HK drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, smaller than the maximum NIO drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2015.HK and NIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-46.51%
-89.61%
2015.HK
NIO

Volatility

2015.HK vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) is 17.79%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 19.27%. This indicates that 2015.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
17.79%
19.27%
2015.HK
NIO

Financials

2015.HK vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. 2015.HK values in HKD, NIO values in USD