PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
2015.HK vs. LI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


2015.HKLI
YTD Return-49.63%-48.92%
1Y Return-53.40%-53.00%
3Y Return (Ann)-13.83%-13.79%
Sharpe Ratio-0.85-0.85
Daily Std Dev62.71%61.87%
Max Drawdown-67.21%-69.02%
Current Drawdown-59.79%-59.01%

Fundamentals


2015.HKLI
Market CapHK$157.24B$20.52B
EPSHK$4.80$1.35
PE Ratio14.0614.16
PEG Ratio0.890.89
Total Revenue (TTM)HK$133.72B$130.72B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$28.89B$27.43B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between 2015.HK and LI is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

2015.HK vs. LI - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 2015.HK having a -49.63% return and LI slightly higher at -48.92%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-36.81%
-36.50%
2015.HK
LI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

2015.HK vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2015.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at -1.28, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 2015.HK, currently valued at -1.36, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00-1.36
LI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LI, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LI, currently valued at -1.21, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LI, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.85
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LI, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LI, currently valued at -1.31, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00-1.31

2015.HK vs. LI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2015.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which roughly equals the LI Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 2015.HK and LI.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.85
-0.83
2015.HK
LI

Dividends

2015.HK vs. LI - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2015.HK nor LI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

2015.HK vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2015.HK drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, roughly equal to the maximum LI drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2015.HK and LI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-59.76%
-59.01%
2015.HK
LI

Volatility

2015.HK vs. LI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) is 17.60%, while Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a volatility of 24.90%. This indicates that 2015.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
17.60%
24.90%
2015.HK
LI

Financials

2015.HK vs. LI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. 2015.HK values in HKD, LI values in USD