2015.HK vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
2015.HK Li Auto Inc	9.79%	-30.97%	-36.13%	91.54%	-37.41%	4.87%
AAPL Apple Inc	-5.24%	9.26%	30.03%	48.99%	-26.28%	19.67%

Different Trading Currencies

2015.HK is traded in HKD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2015.HK achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -5.88% return.

2015.HK

• 1D: 5.17%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 6M: -29.78%
• 1Y: -28.08%
• 3Y*: -10.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.90%
• YTD: -5.88%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 15.07%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 16.39%
• 10Y*: 26.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

2015.HK vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2015.HK

2015.HK Risk / Return Rank: 17
2015.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
2015.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
2015.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 16
2015.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
2015.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 22

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 56
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	0.48	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.70	0.93	-1.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.13	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	0.68	-1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	2.18	-3.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2015.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2015.HK and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64	0.48	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.86	-1.02

Correlation

The correlation between 2015.HK and AAPL is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

2015.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2015.HK Li Auto Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2015.HK drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -61.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2015.HK and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.21%	-81.80%	+14.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.32%	-22.99%	-27.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.37%	-10.59%	-50.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-29.71%	-7.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.48%	7.41%	+24.07%

Volatility

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) has a higher volatility of 13.06% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.56%. This indicates that 2015.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.06%	5.56%	+7.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.24%	15.09%	+10.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.85%	31.56%	+13.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.35%	27.43%	+36.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.35%	28.90%	+35.45%

Financials