2015.HK vs. AAPL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2015.HK (Li Auto Inc) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. 2015.HK operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 3 years, 2015.HK returned -21.13%/yr vs 20.20%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2015.HK is traded in HKD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2015.HK achieves a -11.72% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 14.00% return.

2015.HK

• 1D: -3.13%
• 1M: -15.62%
• YTD: -11.72%
• 6M: -18.10%
• 1Y: -50.98%
• 3Y*: -21.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPL

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 53.56%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: 20.39%
• 10Y*: 29.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
2015.HK Li Auto Inc	-11.72%	-30.97%	-36.13%	91.54%	-37.41%	4.87%
AAPL Apple Inc	14.00%	9.26%	30.03%	48.99%	-26.28%	19.67%

Correlation

The correlation between 2015.HK and AAPL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2021	0.05

Return for Risk

2015.HK vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2015.HK

2015.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
2015.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
2015.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
2015.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4
2015.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
2015.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 89
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	2.42	-3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.97	3.38	-5.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.43	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	3.95	-4.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	10.17	-11.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2015.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2015.HK and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.22	2.42	-3.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.83	-1.05

Drawdowns

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2015.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.94%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -61.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2015.HK and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.94%	-61.10%	-7.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.02%	-13.63%	-40.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.94%	-33.34%	-35.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.94%	-2.54%	-66.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.15%	-11.72%	-26.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.22%	5.28%	+30.94%

Volatility

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) has a higher volatility of 20.38% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.20%. This indicates that 2015.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2015.HK	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.38%	5.20%	+15.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.00%	15.94%	+15.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.29%	22.32%	+19.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.04%	27.42%	+36.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.04%	28.86%	+35.18%

Dividends

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

2015.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2015.HK Li Auto Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.34%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2015.HK and AAPL in my portfolio?

2015.HK and AAPL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.