PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
2015.HK vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

2015.HK vs. AAPL

Last updated May 11, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2015.HK or AAPL.

Correlation

The correlation between 2015.HK and AAPL is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

2015.HK:

-0.05

AAPL:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

2015.HK:

0.69

AAPL:

0.63

Omega Ratio

2015.HK:

1.09

AAPL:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

2015.HK:

0.18

AAPL:

0.28

Martin Ratio

2015.HK:

0.41

AAPL:

0.95

Ulcer Index

2015.HK:

26.78%

AAPL:

9.81%

Daily Std Dev

2015.HK:

64.11%

AAPL:

32.34%

Max Drawdown

2015.HK:

-67.21%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

2015.HK:

-43.68%

AAPL:

-23.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

2015.HK:

HK$210.36B

AAPL:

$2.97T

EPS

2015.HK:

HK$3.50

AAPL:

$6.41

PE Ratio

2015.HK:

25.50

AAPL:

30.97

PEG Ratio

2015.HK:

0.91

AAPL:

1.97

PS Ratio

2015.HK:

1.46

AAPL:

7.41

PB Ratio

2015.HK:

2.82

AAPL:

43.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

2015.HK:

HK$118.83B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

2015.HK:

HK$24.37B

AAPL:

$186.70B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2015.HK achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -20.63% return.

2015.HK

YTD

9.96%

1M

21.55%

6M

8.07%

1Y

-1.61%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AAPL

YTD

-20.63%

1M

4.26%

6M

-12.43%

1Y

8.82%

5Y*

21.04%

10Y*

21.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2015.HK vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
2015.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 2015.HK is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 2015.HK is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 2015.HK is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 2015.HK is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 2015.HK is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 2015.HK is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current 2015.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2015.HK and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

2015.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
2015.HK
Li Auto Inc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc		0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2015.HK drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2015.HK and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) has a higher volatility of 23.97% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 10.70%. This indicates that 2015.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
44.27B
95.36B
(2015.HK) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 2015.HK values in HKD, AAPL values in USD

2015.HK vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Li Auto Inc and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
20.3%
47.1%
(2015.HK) Gross Margin
(AAPL) Gross Margin
2015.HK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Li Auto Inc reported a gross profit of 8.97B and revenue of 44.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 44.87B and revenue of 95.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

2015.HK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Li Auto Inc reported an operating income of 3.70B and revenue of 44.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 29.59B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

2015.HK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Li Auto Inc reported a net income of 3.52B and revenue of 44.27B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a net income of 24.78B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.