2015.HK vs. 0939.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2015.HK or 0939.HK.
Key characteristics
| 2015.HK | 0939.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -32.77% | 6.88% |
| 1Y Return | 10.01% | 3.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Daily Std Dev | 60.14% | 20.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.21% | -69.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -46.34% | -18.98% |
Fundamentals
| 2015.HK | 0939.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$196.38B | HK$1.27T |
| EPS | HK$5.82 | HK$1.30 |
| PE Ratio | 16.51 | 3.50 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.01 | 0.79 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$123.85B | HK$622.34B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$8.79B | HK$667.93B |
Correlation
The correlation between 2015.HK and 0939.HK is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
2015.HK vs. 0939.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 2015.HK achieves a -32.77% return, which is significantly lower than 0939.HK's 6.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2015.HK vs. 0939.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2015.HK vs. 0939.HK - Dividend Comparison
2015.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 0939.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015.HK Li Auto Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
0939.HK China Construction Bank Corp | 8.49% | 9.08% | 8.71% | 7.24% | 5.94% | 5.19% | 5.34% | 4.44% | 5.41% | 7.18% | 5.93% | 5.76% |
Drawdowns
2015.HK vs. 0939.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2015.HK drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, roughly equal to the maximum 0939.HK drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2015.HK and 0939.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2015.HK vs. 0939.HK - Volatility Comparison
Li Auto Inc (2015.HK) has a higher volatility of 18.25% compared to China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) at 5.31%. This indicates that 2015.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0939.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
2015.HK vs. 0939.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities