1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Koninklijke Philips N.V. (1PHIA.MI) and Exor N.V. (EXO.AS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 1PHIA.MI or EXO.AS.
Correlation
The correlation between 1PHIA.MI and EXO.AS is NaN. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
1PHIA.MI:
0.48
EXO.AS:
0.08
1PHIA.MI:
1.21
EXO.AS:
0.22
1PHIA.MI:
1.19
EXO.AS:
1.03
1PHIA.MI:
0.34
EXO.AS:
0.08
1PHIA.MI:
1.93
EXO.AS:
0.18
1PHIA.MI:
10.51%
EXO.AS:
7.69%
1PHIA.MI:
41.96%
EXO.AS:
17.64%
1PHIA.MI:
-74.62%
EXO.AS:
-16.61%
1PHIA.MI:
-43.78%
EXO.AS:
-14.23%
Fundamentals
1PHIA.MI:
€23.42B
EXO.AS:
€29.87B
1PHIA.MI:
-€0.47
EXO.AS:
€75.91
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1PHIA.MI achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than EXO.AS's 1.64% return.
1PHIA.MI
2.30%
4.57%
3.79%
20.29%
-8.17%
3.23%
EXO.AS
1.64%
0.84%
-7.36%
2.36%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
1PHIA.MI
EXO.AS
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (1PHIA.MI) and Exor N.V. (EXO.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS - Dividend Comparison
1PHIA.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXO.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
Drawdowns
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1PHIA.MI drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than EXO.AS's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1PHIA.MI and EXO.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (1PHIA.MI) is NaN%, while Exor N.V. (EXO.AS) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that 1PHIA.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXO.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
1PHIA.MI vs. EXO.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Exor N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Recent discussions
Filtering portfolio screening columns
Bee Zee
Additions to Wishlist: Monte-Carlo Simulations
Hello Dmitry,
Is it possible to add Monte-Carlo simulations to the list of available tools? Since Portfolioslab doesn't have it, I need to use some other Websites just to run Monte-Carlos of my portfolios. Thank you!
Investing_4Fun
VUG vs FOCPX
FOCPX vs VUG is absolutely incorrect. I ran the same comparison on Morning star and FOCPX has out performed but your graph shows the opposite.
what is the source of this data. is it trust worthy.
SK