1038.HK vs. 0006.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (1038.HK) and Power Assets (0006.HK).

Performance

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (1038.HK) and Power Assets (0006.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1038.HK CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd	11.46%	4.91%	40.97%	12.13%	-13.59%	25.53%	-20.62%	-2.64%	-8.13%	12.55%
0006.HK Power Assets	13.69%	7.54%	27.04%	12.95%	-7.08%	22.60%	-21.86%	10.11%	-5.11%	7.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1038.HK achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than 0006.HK's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, 1038.HK has underperformed 0006.HK with an annualized return of 3.00%, while 0006.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 4.72% annualized return.

1038.HK

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 6M: 24.18%
• 1Y: 41.72%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

0006.HK

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 13.69%
• 6M: 26.16%
• 1Y: 39.22%
• 3Y*: 21.13%
• 5Y*: 13.23%
• 10Y*: 4.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1038.HK

1038.HK Risk / Return Rank: 90
1038.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
1038.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
1038.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 87
1038.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
1038.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

0006.HK

0006.HK Risk / Return Rank: 93
0006.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
0006.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
0006.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 91
0006.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
0006.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (1038.HK) and Power Assets (0006.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1038.HK	0006.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.46	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.33	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.94	6.49	-1.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.08	14.66	-2.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1038.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the 0006.HK Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1038.HK and 0006.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1038.HK	0006.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.46	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.79	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.28	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.51	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between 1038.HK and 0006.HK is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Dividend Comparison

1038.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than 0006.HK's 4.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1038.HK CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd	4.03%	4.50%	4.45%	5.88%	6.14%	4.99%	5.91%	4.38%	4.03%	3.43%	3.53%	2.89%
0006.HK Power Assets	4.50%	5.11%	5.20%	6.23%	6.60%	5.80%	6.67%	4.91%	16.15%	11.81%	3.98%	3.77%

Drawdowns

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1038.HK drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, which is greater than 0006.HK's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1038.HK and 0006.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	1038.HK	0006.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.54%	-35.12%	-13.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-6.25%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.03%	-31.28%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.96%	-35.12%	-11.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	-1.42%	-2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.56%	-9.05%	-3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	2.76%	+0.84%

Volatility

1038.HK vs. 0006.HK - Volatility Comparison

CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (1038.HK) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Power Assets (0006.HK) at 6.28%. This indicates that 1038.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0006.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1038.HK	0006.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.87%	6.28%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.38%	12.33%	+4.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	16.42%	+3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.09%	17.24%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.77%	17.52%	+3.25%

Financials