0066.HK vs. 9988.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MTR Corp Ltd (0066.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK).

Performance

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in MTR Corp Ltd (0066.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
0066.HK MTR Corp Ltd	9.46%	15.38%	-6.28%	-23.99%	2.22%	-0.72%	-3.03%	6.23%
9988.HK Alibaba Group Holding Ltd	-17.02%	73.87%	11.01%	-11.14%	-27.46%	-48.79%	12.07%	10.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0066.HK achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly higher than 9988.HK's -17.02% return.

0066.HK

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -10.73%
• YTD: 9.46%
• 6M: 23.19%
• 1Y: 31.64%
• 3Y*: -0.79%
• 5Y*: -2.09%
• 10Y*: 1.73%

9988.HK

• 1D: -3.42%
• 1M: -12.09%
• YTD: -17.02%
• 6M: -35.28%
• 1Y: -8.05%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: -11.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0066.HK

0066.HK Risk / Return Rank: 81
0066.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
0066.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
0066.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
0066.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
0066.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 79

9988.HK

9988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 32
9988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
9988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
9988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 30
9988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
9988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MTR Corp Ltd (0066.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0066.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	-0.17	+1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	0.11	+2.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.01	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	-0.18	+2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	-0.41	+6.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0066.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the 9988.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0066.HK and 9988.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0066.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	-0.17	+1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	-0.23	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	-0.13	+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between 0066.HK and 9988.HK is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Dividend Comparison

0066.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than 9988.HK's 0.87% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0066.HK MTR Corp Ltd	4.02%	4.40%	4.83%	4.32%	3.48%	2.94%	2.84%	2.61%	2.72%	2.34%	2.81%	2.73%
9988.HK Alibaba Group Holding Ltd	0.87%	0.72%	1.18%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0066.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, smaller than the maximum 9988.HK drawdown of -80.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0066.HK and 9988.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	0066.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.83%	-80.01%	+18.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.93%	-35.98%	+20.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.16%	-74.16%	+28.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.42%	-60.07%	+33.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.15%	-51.85%	+34.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	15.74%	-10.79%

Volatility

0066.HK vs. 9988.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MTR Corp Ltd (0066.HK) is 9.56%, while Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK) has a volatility of 14.04%. This indicates that 0066.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9988.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0066.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.56%	14.04%	-4.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.26%	29.88%	-14.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.95%	49.24%	-30.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.69%	51.63%	-32.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	49.42%	-30.58%

Financials