^XCMP vs. ADP
^XCMP (NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index) is an index, while ADP (Automatic Data Processing, Inc.) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
^XCMP vs. ADP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^XCMP
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- 6M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -4.46%
- 1Y
- -17.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
^XCMP vs. ADP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^XCMP NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index | 0.07% |
ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^XCMP and ADP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^XCMP vs. ADP — Risk / Return Rank
^XCMP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADP
^XCMP vs. ADP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^XCMP | ADP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^XCMP vs. ADP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^XCMP drawdown since its inception was -7.07%, smaller than the maximum ADP drawdown of -59.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCMP and ADP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^XCMP | ADP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -59.51% | +52.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -23.54% | +20.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -12.62% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.35% | — |
Volatility
^XCMP vs. ADP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^XCMP | ADP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 25.21% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 22.34% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 24.56% | -2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^XCMP and ADP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ^XCMP and ADP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer