PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XCI vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XCI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCI achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XCI has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 27.00%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 22.07% annualized return.


^XCI

1D
-2.93%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
13.47%
6M
12.60%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
31.87%
5Y*
22.85%
10Y*
27.00%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^XCI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XCI
ARCA Computer Technology Index
13.47%26.59%42.26%66.65%-32.43%41.49%43.93%49.12%-3.42%37.69%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCI and QQQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.93

The correlation between ^XCI and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XCI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XCI
^XCI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
^XCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
^XCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XCI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^XCIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.93

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

10.86

-4.46

^XCI vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCI and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^XCI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCI drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCI and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XCIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-82.97%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.85%

-11.96%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-22.77%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.04%

-35.12%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-35.12%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.66%

-4.25%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.25%

-32.73%

+7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

3.22%

+2.94%

Volatility

^XCI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 9.42% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XCIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.42%

9.17%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

14.57%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

17.96%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

22.69%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.32%

22.42%

+2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


^XCI and QQQ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^XCI has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XCI dropped -77.19% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XCI and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer