PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XCI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XCI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^XCI vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XCI
ARCA Computer Technology Index
-8.61%26.59%42.26%66.65%-32.43%41.49%43.93%49.12%-3.42%37.69%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCI achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XCI has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 23.39%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


^XCI

1D
1.23%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-8.61%
6M
-7.44%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
19.88%
10Y*
23.39%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XCI vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XCI
^XCI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
^XCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XCI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
^XCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XCI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^XCI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

0.92

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.41

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.41

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.49

6.61

-1.12

^XCI vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^XCI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.92

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.61

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.68

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCI and ^GSPC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^XCI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCI drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCI and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^XCI^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-56.78%

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.85%

-12.14%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.04%

-25.43%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-33.92%

-3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.22%

-5.78%

-8.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.38%

-10.75%

-20.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.98%

2.60%

+3.38%

Volatility

^XCI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ^XCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^XCI^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

5.37%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

9.55%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.20%

18.33%

+8.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

16.90%

+8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

18.05%

+7.05%