^IXF vs. AVUV
^IXF (NASDAQ Financial 100 Index) is an index, while AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, ^IXF returned 3.03%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
^IXF vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^IXF achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 20.76% return.
^IXF
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 39.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
^IXF vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^IXF NASDAQ Financial 100 Index | -1.77% | 13.38% | 22.61% | 10.06% | -25.89% | 24.95% | 1.07% | 2.93% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 20.76% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^IXF and AVUV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ^IXF and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^IXF vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
^IXF
AVUV
^IXF vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^IXF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 5.00 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 14.84 | -14.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^IXF vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^IXF drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXF and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^IXF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.80% | -49.42% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.87% | -7.95% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.75% | -28.79% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.61% | -28.79% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -1.61% | -4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -7.90% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 2.68% | +3.60% |
Volatility
^IXF vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.28%. This indicates that ^IXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^IXF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 4.28% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 11.39% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 17.67% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 22.65% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 28.23% | -5.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^IXF and AVUV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^IXF has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to AVUV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IXF dropped -61.80% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^IXF and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer