^IXF vs. AVUV
^IXF (NASDAQ Financial 100 Index) is an index, while AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, ^IXF returned 3.99%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
^IXF vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^IXF achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.30% return.
^IXF
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 22.30%
- 1Y
- 32.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
^IXF vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^IXF NASDAQ Financial 100 Index | 1.79% | 13.38% | 22.61% | 10.06% | -25.89% | 24.95% | 1.07% | 2.93% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 22.30% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^IXF and AVUV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ^IXF and AVUV has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^IXF vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
^IXF
AVUV
^IXF vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^IXF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 3.95 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 11.73 | -11.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^IXF vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^IXF drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXF and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^IXF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.80% | -49.42% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.87% | -7.95% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.75% | -28.79% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.61% | -28.79% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -0.79% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -7.84% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | 2.68% | +3.72% |
Volatility
^IXF vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 3.58%. This indicates that ^IXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^IXF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.58% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 11.20% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 17.34% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 22.54% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 28.13% | -5.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^IXF and AVUV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^IXF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to AVUV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IXF dropped -61.80% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^IXF and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer