PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^IXF vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^IXF vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^IXF vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
^IXF
NASDAQ Financial 100 Index
-8.74%13.38%22.61%10.06%-25.89%24.95%1.07%3.75%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
8.60%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IXF achieves a -8.74% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 8.60% return.


^IXF

1D
2.36%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
-8.74%
6M
-12.11%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
7.73%

AVUV

1D
2.03%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
8.60%
6M
11.68%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^IXF vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IXF
^IXF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
^IXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IXF vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^IXFAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

1.23

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.52

1.80

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.87

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.21

7.37

-6.16

^IXF vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IXF Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXF and AVUV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^IXFAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

1.23

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.45

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.52

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ^IXF and AVUV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^IXF vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IXF drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXF and AVUV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^IXFAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.80%

-49.42%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.87%

-15.43%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.61%

-28.79%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.21%

-4.14%

-9.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-8.14%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

3.91%

+1.42%

Volatility

^IXF vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (^IXF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^IXFAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

5.51%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

13.11%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

23.46%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

22.95%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

28.60%

-6.07%