PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a RUB 10,000 investment in MOEX Russia Index (^IMOEX) and PJSC LUKOIL (LKOH.ME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^IMOEX
MOEX Russia Index
0.36%-4.04%-6.97%43.87%-43.12%15.15%7.98%29.14%11.79%-5.51%
LKOH.ME
PJSC LUKOIL
-6.27%-18.78%15.05%94.23%-33.86%38.68%-9.22%31.28%57.58%3.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IMOEX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than LKOH.ME's -6.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IMOEX has underperformed LKOH.ME with an annualized return of 4.11%, while LKOH.ME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


^IMOEX

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
0.36%
6M
4.89%
1Y
-6.34%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
-4.84%
10Y*
4.11%

LKOH.ME

1D
-1.45%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-6.27%
6M
-8.66%
1Y
-20.35%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IMOEX
^IMOEX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
^IMOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IMOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IMOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
^IMOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IMOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

LKOH.ME
LKOH.ME Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LKOH.ME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKOH.ME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKOH.ME Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LKOH.ME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKOH.ME Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MOEX Russia Index (^IMOEX) and PJSC LUKOIL (LKOH.ME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^IMOEXLKOH.MEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

-0.73

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.29

-0.90

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.89

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

-0.68

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.55

-1.27

+0.73

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IMOEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the LKOH.ME Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IMOEX and LKOH.ME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^IMOEXLKOH.MEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

-0.73

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.16

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.48

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.46

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between ^IMOEX and LKOH.ME is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IMOEX drawdown since its inception was -83.89%, which is greater than LKOH.ME's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IMOEX and LKOH.ME.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^IMOEXLKOH.MEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.89%

-71.84%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.37%

-29.01%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.29%

-49.93%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.29%

-49.93%

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.24%

-28.88%

-6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.90%

-16.25%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.35%

15.56%

-6.21%

Volatility

^IMOEX vs. LKOH.ME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MOEX Russia Index (^IMOEX) is 3.17%, while PJSC LUKOIL (LKOH.ME) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that ^IMOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKOH.ME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^IMOEXLKOH.MEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

7.73%

-4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

22.59%

-9.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

27.77%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.73%

35.71%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

32.64%

-8.99%