PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GVZ vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GVZ vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBOE Gold Volatility Index (^GVZ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^GVZ vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GVZ
CBOE Gold Volatility Index
62.58%63.61%-7.76%-2.46%11.23%-29.73%64.61%-6.31%22.99%-32.47%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.57%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GVZ achieves a 62.58% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GVZ has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 7.98%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


^GVZ

1D
-8.94%
1M
17.03%
YTD
62.58%
6M
94.94%
1Y
117.99%
3Y*
30.97%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
7.98%

GLD

1D
3.79%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.05%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBOE Gold Volatility Index

SPDR Gold Shares

Return for Risk

^GVZ vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GVZ
^GVZ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
^GVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
^GVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GVZ vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBOE Gold Volatility Index (^GVZ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^GVZGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.79

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

2.21

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.68

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.49

9.90

-5.42

^GVZ vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GVZ and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^GVZGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.79

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.22

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.88

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.62

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between ^GVZ and GLD is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

^GVZ vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GVZ drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GVZ and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^GVZGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-45.56%

-40.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

-19.21%

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.76%

-21.03%

-46.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.13%

-22.00%

-57.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.73%

-13.23%

-26.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-16.17%

-53.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.38%

5.20%

+25.18%

Volatility

^GVZ vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

CBOE Gold Volatility Index (^GVZ) has a higher volatility of 38.63% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 11.06%. This indicates that ^GVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^GVZGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.63%

11.06%

+27.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.41%

24.30%

+49.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.32%

27.80%

+73.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.94%

17.74%

+60.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.32%

15.87%

+67.45%