PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GVZ vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GVZ vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBOE Gold Volatility Index (^GVZ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GVZ achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GVZ has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 3.97%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.


^GVZ

1D
-1.81%
1M
9.19%
YTD
13.71%
6M
9.54%
1Y
57.13%
3Y*
31.21%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
3.97%

GLD

1D
-0.05%
1M
-11.68%
YTD
-7.05%
6M
-7.65%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
27.37%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GVZ vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GVZ
CBOE Gold Volatility Index
13.71%63.61%-7.76%-2.46%11.23%-29.73%64.61%-6.31%22.99%-32.47%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-7.05%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GVZ and GLD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2008

0.08

The correlation between ^GVZ and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GVZ vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GVZ
^GVZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
^GVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
^GVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GVZ vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBOE Gold Volatility Index (^GVZ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^GVZGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.80

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

2.14

-0.06

^GVZ vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GVZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GVZ and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^GVZ vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GVZ drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GVZ and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GVZGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-45.56%

-40.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.15%

-26.21%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.15%

-26.21%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.76%

-26.21%

-41.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.13%

-26.21%

-52.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.85%

-25.71%

-32.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.86%

-16.17%

-53.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.56%

9.78%

+17.78%

Volatility

^GVZ vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

CBOE Gold Volatility Index (^GVZ) has a higher volatility of 38.28% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 8.57%. This indicates that ^GVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GVZGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.28%

8.57%

+29.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.32%

24.46%

+49.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.36%

27.70%

+67.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.87%

18.31%

+61.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.77%

16.07%

+67.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GVZ and GLD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GVZ has higher volatility (38.28%) compared to GLD (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GVZ dropped -86.24% vs GLD's -45.56%.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GVZ and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer