^DJUSL vs. DIA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Index (^DJUSL) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).

DIA is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It was launched on Jan 14, 1998.

Performance

^DJUSL vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Index (^DJUSL) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^DJUSL vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^DJUSL Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Index	-5.54%	17.84%	26.52%	28.92%	-21.96%	25.66%	19.80%	28.82%	-5.11%	20.08%
DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF	-2.78%	14.71%	14.82%	16.02%	-7.02%	20.83%	9.59%	24.70%	-3.74%	28.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJUSL achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's -2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJUSL has outperformed DIA with an annualized return of 12.97%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.

^DJUSL

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -3.02%
• 1Y: 17.34%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: 12.97%

DIA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: -2.78%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 12.67%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^DJUSL vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJUSL

^DJUSL Risk / Return Rank: 63
^DJUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
^DJUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
^DJUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
^DJUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
^DJUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DIA

DIA Risk / Return Rank: 41
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DJUSL vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Index (^DJUSL) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^DJUSL	DIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.76	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	1.19	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.16	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.17	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	4.26	+1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^DJUSL vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DJUSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJUSL and DIA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^DJUSL	DIA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	0.76	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.61	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.70	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.47	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJUSL and DIA is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

^DJUSL vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJUSL drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than DIA's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJUSL and DIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	^DJUSL	DIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-51.87%	-8.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.01%	-10.79%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.28%	-20.76%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.75%	-36.70%	+3.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.97%	-6.94%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.77%	-7.17%	-10.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.95%	-0.07%

Volatility

^DJUSL vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Index (^DJUSL) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) at 4.94%. This indicates that ^DJUSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^DJUSL	DIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	4.94%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	9.24%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.06%	16.81%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	14.73%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	17.50%	+0.85%