PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Comparison1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


ETH-USD 16.67%VOO 16.67%QQQ 16.67%VGT 16.67%META 16.67%NVDA 16.67%CryptocurrencyCryptocurrencyEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Comparison1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Aug 7, 2015, corresponding to the inception date of ETH-USD

Returns By Period

As of Apr 11, 2026, the Comparison1 returned -5.12% Year-To-Date and 50.94% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.11%2.78%-0.42%4.03%27.10%18.38%10.55%12.70%
Portfolio
Comparison1
-0.59%3.77%-5.12%-8.47%41.75%36.45%23.33%50.94%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
-3.49%5.41%-25.64%-46.92%34.20%3.08%-0.83%74.44%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-0.07%2.87%-0.09%4.64%28.85%19.99%12.14%14.61%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.14%3.05%-0.40%3.92%35.13%25.34%13.31%19.62%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.42%4.14%-1.29%1.15%43.51%26.14%15.01%22.32%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.23%2.72%-4.50%-10.55%16.24%43.72%15.23%19.09%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
2.57%4.65%1.15%3.00%70.08%90.83%67.37%71.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Aug 8, 2015, Comparison1's average daily return is +0.15%, while the average monthly return is +4.80%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.2 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Feb 2016 with a return of +64.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -16.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Comparison1 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Feb 11, 2016 with a return of +20.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -18.3%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-0.77%-6.76%-3.89%6.70%-5.12%
20251.73%-6.40%-10.90%-0.66%18.07%8.19%12.41%3.66%2.18%0.59%-6.83%1.10%21.48%
20246.66%19.67%5.28%-7.93%13.11%5.16%-3.17%-0.97%3.67%0.45%11.38%-2.57%59.46%
202319.45%6.41%13.77%2.97%10.49%7.31%4.57%-2.89%-4.53%-0.53%11.61%6.82%102.99%
2022-12.05%-6.61%6.76%-15.51%-5.69%-16.24%18.34%-6.49%-13.67%2.93%7.00%-7.62%-43.11%
202111.55%3.55%11.78%14.10%0.74%4.17%3.39%11.76%-8.33%14.43%7.48%-5.04%91.25%

Benchmark Metrics

Comparison1 has an annualized alpha of 35.46%, beta of 1.26, and R² of 0.45 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since August 08, 2015.

  • This portfolio captured 213.91% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 53.24% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • R² of 0.45 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
35.46%
Beta
1.26
0.45
Upside Capture
213.91%
Downside Capture
53.24%

Expense Ratio

Comparison1 has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Comparison1 ranks 11 for risk / return — in the bottom 11% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Comparison1 Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
Comparison1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Comparison1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
Comparison1 Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
Comparison1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
Comparison1 Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

2.23

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

3.12

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

4.05

-4.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

17.91

-18.17


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
ETH-USD
Ethereum
780.471.201.12-0.78-1.28
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
662.373.291.444.3119.24
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
572.233.001.403.9814.88
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
502.212.881.383.5811.33
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
440.440.921.120.711.74
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
812.192.751.344.7511.78

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Comparison1 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 11, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.68
  • 5-Year: 0.76
  • 10-Year: 1.54
  • All Time: 1.71

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.14 to 3.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Comparison1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Comparison1 provided a 0.39% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.39%0.39%0.46%0.46%0.59%0.39%0.51%0.67%0.79%0.65%0.81%0.93%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.14%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.46%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.41%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.33%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Comparison1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Comparison1 was 49.69%, occurring on Nov 9, 2022. Recovery took 366 trading sessions.

The current Comparison1 drawdown is 13.39%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-49.69%Nov 21, 2021354Nov 9, 2022366Nov 10, 2023720
-43.37%Jan 29, 2018327Dec 21, 2018391Jan 16, 2020718
-39.04%Feb 19, 202027Mar 16, 202085Jun 9, 2020112
-31.27%Dec 9, 2024121Apr 8, 202583Jun 30, 2025204
-22.48%Oct 30, 2025152Mar 30, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkETH-USDMETANVDAVOOVGTQQQPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.220.620.641.000.900.910.69
ETH-USD0.221.000.130.150.180.170.180.73
META0.620.131.000.470.560.590.650.54
NVDA0.640.150.471.000.580.720.690.62
VOO1.000.180.560.581.000.850.860.60
VGT0.900.170.590.720.851.000.930.65
QQQ0.910.180.650.690.860.931.000.66
Portfolio0.690.730.540.620.600.650.661.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Aug 8, 2015