PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
top of the top but in the past
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


MU 20.00%STX 20.00%GE 20.00%CLS 20.00%NVDA 20.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in top of the top but in the past, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Dec 11, 2002, corresponding to the inception date of STX

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the top of the top but in the past returned 13.38% Year-To-Date and 45.25% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
top of the top but in the past
0.07%-1.60%13.38%34.79%237.90%107.88%62.14%45.25%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
-0.44%-8.58%28.37%95.15%393.83%84.06%32.37%42.60%
STX
Seagate Technology plc
1.47%14.69%56.18%70.59%507.99%91.95%44.92%34.94%
GE
General Electric Company
-3.94%-17.14%-8.59%-5.09%50.64%54.57%34.17%7.77%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
2.12%8.94%-0.26%26.18%326.13%185.72%102.26%39.05%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.93%-3.08%-4.88%-5.44%74.29%85.17%66.71%70.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Dec 12, 2002, top of the top but in the past's average daily return is +0.11%, while the average monthly return is +2.23%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.6 years.

Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was May 2003 with a return of +32.6%, while the worst month was Nov 2008 at -22.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, top of the top but in the past closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +15.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -17.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
202617.99%0.35%-8.57%4.73%13.38%
202513.10%-0.49%-13.16%1.02%26.91%22.10%8.83%2.04%25.01%18.53%-0.12%3.18%159.41%
20249.27%17.77%12.14%-0.87%15.03%5.49%-4.83%-2.28%5.60%4.41%8.14%-4.06%84.66%
202324.89%2.77%8.79%-3.46%12.88%6.10%16.41%4.33%-3.05%-2.16%14.41%8.20%130.19%
2022-4.29%-0.17%-3.57%-15.43%3.07%-17.84%13.66%-8.96%-16.86%13.77%10.05%-5.79%-33.05%
20211.81%10.77%1.20%6.14%4.22%1.18%-0.52%3.79%-5.07%8.30%12.52%3.34%57.65%

Benchmark Metrics

top of the top but in the past has an annualized alpha of 14.10%, beta of 1.36, and R² of 0.60 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since December 12, 2002.

  • This portfolio captured 227.54% of S&P 500 Index gains and 138.59% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 14.10% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
14.10%
Beta
1.36
0.60
Upside Capture
227.54%
Downside Capture
138.59%

Expense Ratio

top of the top but in the past has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

top of the top but in the past ranks 99 for risk / return — in the top 99% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


top of the top but in the past Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
top of the top but in the past Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
top of the top but in the past Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
top of the top but in the past Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
top of the top but in the past Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
top of the top but in the past Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.37

0.88

+3.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.08

1.37

+2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.21

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.92

1.39

+8.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

36.57

6.43

+30.14


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
984.843.991.5410.3734.71
STX
Seagate Technology plc
996.324.871.6618.6751.89
GE
General Electric Company
751.271.731.251.866.67
CLS
Celestica Inc.
963.623.291.449.3424.62
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
811.472.171.273.027.54

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

top of the top but in the past Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 4.37
  • 5-Year: 1.75
  • 10-Year: 1.36
  • All Time: 0.74

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of top of the top but in the past compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

top of the top but in the past provided a 0.28% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.28%0.34%0.90%0.82%1.34%0.60%0.94%1.73%2.37%2.23%2.00%2.06%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.14%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STX
Seagate Technology plc
0.68%1.05%3.27%3.28%5.32%2.40%4.21%4.27%6.53%6.02%6.60%6.14%
GE
General Electric Company
0.55%0.47%0.67%0.25%0.38%0.34%0.37%4.12%4.89%4.81%2.94%2.95%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the top of the top but in the past. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the top of the top but in the past was 75.78%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 553 trading sessions.

The current top of the top but in the past drawdown is 9.61%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-75.78%Oct 19, 2007276Nov 20, 2008553Feb 2, 2011829
-45.04%Jan 5, 2022186Sep 30, 2022164May 26, 2023350
-44.57%Feb 18, 2011157Oct 3, 2011326Jan 22, 2013483
-43.31%Jun 12, 2018136Dec 24, 2018426Sep 2, 2020562
-35.75%Feb 19, 202533Apr 4, 202535May 27, 202568

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkGECLSSTXNVDAMUPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.620.520.520.590.560.73
GE0.621.000.380.360.340.370.58
CLS0.520.381.000.390.400.420.69
STX0.520.360.391.000.430.470.71
NVDA0.590.340.400.431.000.550.75
MU0.560.370.420.470.551.000.78
Portfolio0.730.580.690.710.750.781.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Dec 12, 2002