PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETF All-Rounder
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


IWB 30.00%QQQ 30.00%VOO 30.00%MCHI 10.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in ETF All-Rounder, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every year.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Mar 31, 2011, corresponding to the inception date of MCHI

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the ETF All-Rounder returned -4.19% Year-To-Date and 14.96% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
ETF All-Rounder
0.08%-2.98%-4.19%-3.66%17.75%18.91%10.73%14.96%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-0.29%-1.86%-7.04%-15.63%5.39%6.34%-5.77%4.71%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
0.14%-3.34%-3.41%-1.54%17.21%18.19%11.10%13.88%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.11%-2.64%-4.65%-3.18%23.45%22.97%13.18%19.05%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.11%-3.33%-3.55%-1.41%17.60%18.47%11.96%14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 1, 2011, ETF All-Rounder's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.16%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.0 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +12.8%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -10.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, ETF All-Rounder closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +9.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.60%-1.67%-4.95%0.90%-4.19%
20252.72%-0.63%-5.43%-0.65%6.68%5.52%2.54%2.28%4.47%2.36%-0.60%-0.42%19.84%
20240.39%5.38%2.54%-3.32%5.21%3.66%0.13%1.85%4.02%-1.09%4.91%-1.35%24.23%
20238.35%-2.65%5.42%0.58%2.02%6.27%4.15%-2.28%-4.79%-2.29%9.25%4.62%31.21%
2022-5.91%-3.70%2.52%-9.84%-0.18%-6.87%7.83%-3.93%-10.07%4.61%7.46%-5.86%-23.27%
20210.34%1.59%2.38%5.01%-0.02%3.36%1.03%3.03%-4.96%6.91%-0.42%2.78%22.59%

Benchmark Metrics

ETF All-Rounder has an annualized alpha of 2.09%, beta of 1.02, and R² of 0.96 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 01, 2011.

  • This portfolio captured 107.17% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 96.01% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.09% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.02 and R² of 0.96, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
2.09%
Beta
1.02
0.96
Upside Capture
107.17%
Downside Capture
96.01%

Expense Ratio

ETF All-Rounder has an expense ratio of 0.17%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

ETF All-Rounder ranks 28 for risk / return — below 28% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


ETF All-Rounder Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ETF All-Rounder Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETF All-Rounder Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETF All-Rounder Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ETF All-Rounder Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETF All-Rounder Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.88

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

6.43

-0.28


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
160.230.471.060.270.70
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
530.941.451.221.496.95
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
591.041.621.231.937.00
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
540.981.491.231.537.13

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

ETF All-Rounder Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.94
  • 5-Year: 0.60
  • 10-Year: 0.80
  • All Time: 0.77

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.68, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of ETF All-Rounder compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

ETF All-Rounder provided a 1.04% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.04%0.99%1.11%1.28%1.40%0.93%1.14%1.45%1.67%1.43%1.65%1.79%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.28%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
1.05%1.00%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the ETF All-Rounder. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the ETF All-Rounder was 30.86%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 72 trading sessions.

The current ETF All-Rounder drawdown is 6.84%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-30.86%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202072Jul 6, 202095
-28.93%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022301Dec 27, 2023503
-20.08%Aug 30, 201880Dec 24, 201870Apr 5, 2019150
-19.72%Feb 20, 202534Apr 8, 202552Jun 24, 202586
-18.66%May 2, 2011108Oct 3, 201185Feb 3, 2012193

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.57, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkMCHIQQQVOOIWBPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.560.901.000.990.97
MCHI0.561.000.560.560.570.68
QQQ0.900.561.000.900.900.95
VOO1.000.560.901.000.990.97
IWB0.990.570.900.991.000.97
Portfolio0.970.680.950.970.971.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Apr 1, 2011