Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | Technology | 3% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | Consumer Cyclical | 3% |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A | Communication Services | 3% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | Communication Services | 85% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | Technology | 3% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | Communication Services | 3% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Special1 with Weights, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is May 18, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of META
Returns By Period
As of Apr 2, 2026, the Special1 with Weights returned -12.08% Year-To-Date and 19.60% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio Special1 with Weights | -0.60% | -10.77% | -12.08% | -18.55% | 2.39% | 38.40% | 15.17% | 19.60% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -0.82% | -12.23% | -12.90% | -20.86% | -1.31% | 39.54% | 14.16% | 17.80% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 1.11% | -7.54% | -22.60% | -27.29% | -1.52% | 10.00% | 9.94% | 22.58% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.11% | -2.97% | -5.78% | -0.28% | 14.80% | 16.04% | 16.39% | 26.10% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 3.25% | 0.98% | 5.23% | -15.13% | 5.46% | 41.49% | 12.83% | 25.19% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | -0.38% | 0.50% | -9.12% | -5.68% | 7.02% | 27.00% | 5.83% | 21.61% |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A | -0.54% | -2.50% | -5.44% | 20.55% | 88.99% | 41.91% | 22.87% | 22.80% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 21, 2012, Special1 with Weights's average daily return is +0.11%, while the average monthly return is +2.23%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.6 years.
Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Jul 2013 with a return of +41.7%, while the worst month was Feb 2022 at -28.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, Special1 with Weights closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Jul 25, 2013 with a return of +25.3%, while the worst single day was Feb 3, 2022 at -23.2%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6.81% | -8.60% | -10.46% | 0.58% | -12.08% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 15.60% | -3.43% | -12.86% | -3.38% | 16.25% | 12.94% | 4.38% | -3.26% | 0.30% | -9.15% | 0.15% | 0.94% | 14.81% |
| 2024 | 9.28% | 22.72% | -0.57% | -10.06% | 8.51% | 8.00% | -5.46% | 8.44% | 8.81% | -0.69% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 62.90% |
| 2023 | 22.30% | 14.31% | 20.06% | 11.70% | 10.40% | 8.06% | 9.75% | -6.17% | 0.17% | 0.77% | 9.00% | 7.29% | 171.87% |
| 2022 | -7.49% | -28.26% | 4.89% | -11.69% | -3.21% | -15.53% | 1.57% | 1.20% | -15.19% | -25.99% | 21.72% | -0.05% | -60.55% |
| 2021 | -4.47% | -0.18% | 12.08% | 9.99% | 0.52% | 5.92% | 2.61% | 6.47% | -9.54% | -2.46% | 0.30% | 3.05% | 24.70% |
Benchmark Metrics
Special1 with Weights has an annualized alpha of 11.89%, beta of 1.25, and R² of 0.34 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 21, 2012.
- This portfolio captured 138.86% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 89.71% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
- R² of 0.34 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 11.89%
- Beta
- 1.25
- R²
- 0.34
- Upside Capture
- 138.86%
- Downside Capture
- 89.71%
Expense Ratio
Special1 with Weights has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Special1 with Weights ranks 6 for risk / return — in the bottom 6% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.07 | 0.88 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.37 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 1.39 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 6.43 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 36 | -0.03 | 0.25 | 1.03 | -0.05 | -0.12 |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 35 | -0.06 | 0.11 | 1.01 | -0.05 | -0.12 |
AAPL Apple Inc | 55 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 1.13 | 0.66 | 2.04 |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 42 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 1.06 | 0.14 | 0.30 |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 46 | 0.20 | 0.55 | 1.07 | 0.42 | 1.00 |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A | 94 | 2.91 | 3.87 | 1.48 | 4.37 | 16.63 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Special1 with Weights provided a 0.36% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.36% | 0.31% | 0.33% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.93% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A | 0.28% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Special1 with Weights. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Special1 with Weights was 72.35%, occurring on Nov 3, 2022. Recovery took 296 trading sessions.
The current Special1 with Weights drawdown is 22.92%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -72.35% | Sep 8, 2021 | 293 | Nov 3, 2022 | 296 | Jan 10, 2024 | 589 |
| -45.57% | May 21, 2012 | 74 | Sep 4, 2012 | 222 | Jul 25, 2013 | 296 |
| -40.25% | Jul 26, 2018 | 105 | Dec 24, 2018 | 257 | Jan 2, 2020 | 362 |
| -32.26% | Jan 30, 2020 | 32 | Mar 16, 2020 | 46 | May 20, 2020 | 78 |
| -31.94% | Feb 18, 2025 | 44 | Apr 21, 2025 | 47 | Jun 27, 2025 | 91 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.38, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | NFLX | AAPL | MSFT | AMZN | GOOGL | META | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.60 |
| NFLX | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.50 |
| AAPL | 0.63 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.48 |
| MSFT | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.55 |
| AMZN | 0.64 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| GOOGL | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.62 |
| META | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Portfolio | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 1.00 |