PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
aapl msft nvda
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


NVDA 50.00%MSFT 30.00%AAPL 20.00%EquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
Technology
50%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
Technology
30%
AAPL
Apple Inc
Technology
20%

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for aapl msft nvda

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in aapl msft nvda, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 18, 2026, the aapl msft nvda returned 1.57% Year-To-Date and 49.54% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
1.08%2.00%9.57%10.71%25.41%19.37%12.48%13.67%
Portfolio
aapl msft nvda
1.73%-4.86%1.57%5.06%23.94%40.04%39.23%49.54%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.70%-0.32%9.82%9.69%52.20%17.79%18.57%29.98%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.13%-8.91%-21.20%-21.26%-20.37%4.30%8.79%23.97%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
2.95%-4.39%13.11%21.14%45.02%70.37%62.53%68.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 22, 1999, aapl msft nvda's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.95%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.

Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was Jan 2001 with a return of +49.8%, while the worst month was Nov 2000 at -25.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 8 months.

On a daily basis, aapl msft nvda closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 7, 2000 with a return of +24.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 14, 2000 at -21.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-2.97%-5.82%-3.24%11.68%8.98%-5.62%1.57%
2025-6.88%1.12%-9.84%0.94%16.05%11.93%8.67%-0.25%6.29%5.52%-7.25%1.58%27.51%
202413.01%16.60%8.21%-4.57%18.19%10.70%-3.48%1.66%2.12%2.35%4.41%-0.54%89.59%
202320.08%11.16%17.39%2.50%20.85%9.05%5.13%1.55%-9.13%-1.06%13.25%2.85%136.62%
2022-10.95%-2.55%7.91%-20.97%-1.57%-12.03%16.45%-11.18%-15.23%7.70%15.39%-11.39%-38.12%
20210.94%1.31%-0.76%9.86%3.05%16.73%1.60%9.91%-7.06%18.22%16.47%-4.08%83.78%

Benchmark Metrics

aapl msft nvda has an annualized alpha of 27.25%, beta of 1.38, and R2 of 0.45 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 22, 1999.

  • This portfolio captured 273.00% of S&P 500 Index gains and 125.65% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • R2 of 0.45 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior - treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
27.25%
Beta
1.38
0.45
Upside Capture
273.00%
Downside Capture
125.65%

Expense Ratio

aapl msft nvda has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

aapl msft nvda ranks 12 for risk / return — in the bottom 12% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


aapl msft nvda Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
aapl msft nvda Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
aapl msft nvda Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
aapl msft nvda Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
aapl msft nvda Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
aapl msft nvda Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for aapl msft nvda and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.03

2.05

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.77

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.81

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

12.55

-9.77


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
89
2.323.221.423.809.39
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
13
-0.79-0.980.87-0.60-1.21
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
76
1.281.851.222.245.26

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current aapl msft nvda Sharpe ratio is 1.03 as of Jun 18, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.62 to 2.50, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of aapl msft nvda compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

aapl msft nvda provided a 0.42% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.42%0.30%0.31%0.34%0.51%0.33%0.46%0.70%1.09%1.00%1.32%1.68%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.94%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the aapl msft nvda. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the aapl msft nvda was 71.65%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1266 trading sessions.

The current aapl msft nvda drawdown is 10.33%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-71.65%Nov 2008
1y 14d5y 14d
6y 28dNov 2007 - Dec 2013
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-71.34%Oct 2002
9mo 8d2y 4mo
3y 1moJan 2002 - Feb 2005
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-63.07%Dec 2000
9mo 12d11mo 19d
1y 8moMar 2000 - Dec 2001
Bear market2022
-49.04%Oct 2022
10mo 18d7mo 6d
1y 5moNov 2021 - May 2023
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-41.05%Dec 2018
2mo 23d10mo 29d
1y 1moOct 2018 - Nov 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.63, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.29

1.19

1.14

1.13

1.19

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.19, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

aapl msft nvda correlation to the S&P 500 Index

aapl msft nvda has a 0.69 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.67


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.68, while NVDA has the lowest at 0.56.

NVDA
0.56
AAPL
0.58
MSFT
0.68

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. aapl msft nvda. NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.94, while AAPL has the lowest at 0.62.

AAPL
0.62
MSFT
0.67
NVDA
0.94

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

AAPLMSFTNVDA
AAPL1.000.490.43
MSFT0.491.000.48
NVDA0.430.481.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 22, 1999
Diversification Analysis

Find what aapl msft nvda is missing

See which holdings overlap, where aapl msft nvda is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification