PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
class_example
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


SHY 13.10%TLT 12.50%GLD 12.79%UUP 49.82%QQQ 11.79%BondBondCommodityCommodityCurrencyCurrencyEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in class_example, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Mar 1, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of UUP

Returns By Period

As of Apr 15, 2026, the class_example returned 2.77% Year-To-Date and 6.10% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
1.18%5.05%1.78%4.86%28.88%18.97%10.81%12.85%
Portfolio
class_example
0.50%-0.52%2.77%3.47%12.99%9.90%6.88%6.10%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.23%-3.42%12.31%16.89%50.25%33.67%21.90%14.21%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
1.82%6.01%2.46%5.39%38.07%26.16%13.65%19.83%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
-0.22%-2.04%1.07%1.23%3.26%4.31%5.13%2.91%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.07%0.28%0.52%1.20%3.67%3.96%1.74%1.66%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.53%1.18%1.18%-1.87%4.18%-2.14%-6.05%-1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 2, 2007, class_example's average daily return is +0.02%, while the average monthly return is +0.42%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 13.8 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Jan 2015 with a return of +4.6%, while the worst month was Jul 2010 at -2.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, class_example closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +2.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -2.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.40%2.01%-1.51%0.88%2.77%
20251.39%0.52%-1.12%-1.17%0.73%0.26%1.93%-0.10%2.92%2.51%0.60%-0.52%8.15%
20241.16%0.84%1.87%0.08%0.79%1.83%0.46%-0.04%1.24%1.49%1.61%0.70%12.69%
20232.51%0.09%2.05%0.01%1.88%0.07%0.19%0.48%-0.73%0.55%1.66%1.38%10.58%
2022-1.36%0.06%0.63%-0.68%-1.44%0.13%2.08%-0.27%-0.99%-0.72%0.31%-2.00%-4.22%
2021-0.46%-1.29%0.72%0.42%0.17%1.49%1.03%0.69%-0.67%1.26%1.37%0.15%4.95%

Benchmark Metrics

class_example has an annualized alpha of 4.70%, beta of 0.05, and R² of 0.05 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 02, 2007.

  • This portfolio captured 12.09% of S&P 500 Index gains and tended to rise during its downturns (downside capture of -10.12%) — a profile typical of hedging or uncorrelated assets.
  • Beta of 0.05 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.05 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.05 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
4.70%
Beta
0.05
0.05
Upside Capture
12.09%
Downside Capture
-10.12%

Expense Ratio

class_example has an expense ratio of 0.48%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

class_example ranks 76 for risk / return — better than 76% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


class_example Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
class_example Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
class_example Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
class_example Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
class_example Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
class_example Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

2.20

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.23

3.07

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.41

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

3.55

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.81

16.01

+1.80


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
411.852.261.342.729.21
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
592.263.031.403.4713.22
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
120.490.731.090.471.09
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
792.684.311.564.1815.50
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
120.410.651.070.841.83

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

class_example Sharpe ratios as of Apr 15, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.94
  • 5-Year: 1.63
  • 10-Year: 1.46
  • All Time: 1.18

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.14 to 2.98, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of class_example compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

class_example provided a 2.79% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.79%2.81%3.35%4.10%1.04%0.27%0.38%1.66%1.20%0.58%0.54%0.51%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.45%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.39%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.71%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.48%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the class_example. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the class_example was 5.16%, occurring on Aug 25, 2015. Recovery took 211 trading sessions.

The current class_example drawdown is 1.15%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-5.16%Apr 13, 201595Aug 25, 2015211Jun 27, 2016306
-4.91%Feb 19, 200966May 22, 2009185Feb 17, 2010251
-4.74%Nov 22, 2021279Dec 30, 202290May 11, 2023369
-4.51%Jul 25, 2012307Oct 14, 2013205Aug 7, 2014512
-4.38%Jun 8, 201040Aug 3, 2010266Aug 22, 2011306

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.21, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkGLDSHYUUPTLTQQQPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.06-0.20-0.20-0.270.900.22
GLD0.061.000.25-0.440.190.050.21
SHY-0.200.251.00-0.190.60-0.170.13
UUP-0.20-0.44-0.191.00-0.07-0.160.51
TLT-0.270.190.60-0.071.00-0.220.34
QQQ0.900.05-0.17-0.16-0.221.000.31
Portfolio0.220.210.130.510.340.311.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Mar 2, 2007