PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHUCK RET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


DODGX 50.00%JLGMX 50.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in CHUCK RET, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Nov 30, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of JLGMX

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the CHUCK RET returned -4.45% Year-To-Date and 15.81% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
CHUCK RET
0.61%-3.27%-4.45%-4.38%10.45%17.79%10.47%15.81%
DODGX
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I
0.25%-3.79%-1.41%0.98%7.46%14.05%9.43%12.58%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
0.97%-2.80%-7.59%-9.68%12.81%20.94%10.92%18.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Dec 1, 2010, CHUCK RET's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.23%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.7 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +16.0%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -14.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, CHUCK RET closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +10.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.15%-0.07%-5.12%0.61%-4.45%
20254.71%-1.21%-5.30%-1.05%5.58%4.99%0.74%2.29%3.09%0.95%-0.92%0.32%14.52%
20242.22%5.87%3.80%-4.09%4.43%3.39%0.84%2.49%1.41%-0.32%5.70%-2.87%24.77%
20236.41%-2.80%1.83%0.70%1.56%6.89%4.23%-1.70%-4.27%-2.95%9.60%4.97%26.09%
2022-4.28%-2.54%2.29%-9.16%1.88%-8.60%7.78%-2.97%-8.51%8.80%5.33%-5.50%-16.37%
20210.11%5.39%2.61%5.73%1.00%1.88%1.17%3.22%-4.62%5.59%-1.64%2.92%25.40%

Benchmark Metrics

CHUCK RET has an annualized alpha of 2.04%, beta of 1.05, and R² of 0.96 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since December 01, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 109.56% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 97.63% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.04% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.05 and R² of 0.96, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
2.04%
Beta
1.05
0.96
Upside Capture
109.56%
Downside Capture
97.63%

Expense Ratio

CHUCK RET has an expense ratio of 0.48%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

CHUCK RET ranks 13 for risk / return — in the bottom 13% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


CHUCK RET Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CHUCK RET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHUCK RET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHUCK RET Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CHUCK RET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHUCK RET Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.88

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

1.37

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.39

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

6.43

-2.72


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
DODGX
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I
150.510.801.120.672.79
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
200.651.071.150.872.61

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

CHUCK RET Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.64
  • 5-Year: 0.62
  • 10-Year: 0.83
  • All Time: 0.79

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of CHUCK RET compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

CHUCK RET provided a 10.90% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio10.90%10.45%5.16%2.04%4.48%8.73%5.94%11.44%12.64%10.61%7.99%4.90%
DODGX
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I
9.86%9.86%8.20%3.76%5.47%3.22%6.74%10.23%9.69%6.78%6.26%5.36%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
11.95%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the CHUCK RET. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the CHUCK RET was 35.83%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 82 trading sessions.

The current CHUCK RET drawdown is 7.28%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-35.83%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202082Jul 20, 2020105
-23.88%Nov 9, 2021225Sep 30, 2022299Dec 8, 2023524
-22.21%Oct 4, 201856Dec 24, 201885Apr 29, 2019141
-20.38%Jul 21, 2015143Feb 11, 2016193Nov 15, 2016336
-19.99%Jul 8, 201161Oct 3, 201191Feb 13, 2012152

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkDODGXJLGMXPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.890.900.97
DODGX0.891.000.730.91
JLGMX0.900.731.000.94
Portfolio0.970.910.941.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Dec 1, 2010