PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
All Word - NQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


LYMS.DE 100.00%EquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
Large Cap Growth Equities
100%

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in All Word - NQ, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 14, 2005, corresponding to the inception date of LYMS.DE

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the All Word - NQ returned -5.83% Year-To-Date and 18.88% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-2.33%-3.84%-1.98%29.73%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
All Word - NQ
-0.36%-3.38%-5.83%-3.63%36.02%23.02%13.11%18.88%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
-0.36%-3.38%-5.83%-3.63%36.02%23.02%13.11%18.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 14, 2007, All Word - NQ's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.32%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.4 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Apr 2009 with a return of +14.2%, while the worst month was Sep 2008 at -19.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, All Word - NQ closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Dec 8, 2008 with a return of +10.3%, while the worst single day was Oct 10, 2008 at -8.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.63%-2.75%-6.15%2.53%-5.83%
20252.57%-5.12%-7.42%1.51%10.18%6.62%3.09%0.03%5.12%5.40%-2.04%0.60%20.96%
20241.80%4.43%1.78%-3.47%3.97%8.63%-2.54%0.23%3.03%0.23%4.87%1.02%26.08%
202310.65%0.11%8.58%0.55%8.74%6.35%3.71%-1.24%-4.61%-3.02%10.62%6.64%56.30%
2022-10.50%-3.35%5.10%-11.70%-4.58%-8.48%11.09%-3.71%-8.63%1.36%2.24%-6.66%-33.73%
20210.72%-0.04%1.11%5.86%-1.49%6.63%2.68%4.39%-5.13%6.55%3.13%1.64%28.58%

Benchmark Metrics

All Word - NQ has an annualized alpha of 11.51%, beta of 0.53, and R² of 0.24 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 14, 2007.

  • This portfolio captured 122.57% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 94.68% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • Beta of 0.53 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.24 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.24 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
11.51%
Beta
0.53
0.24
Upside Capture
122.57%
Downside Capture
94.68%

Expense Ratio

All Word - NQ has an expense ratio of 0.22%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

All Word - NQ ranks 52 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


All Word - NQ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
All Word - NQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
All Word - NQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
All Word - NQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
All Word - NQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
All Word - NQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

0.88

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.37

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.39

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.01

6.43

+3.58


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
671.131.701.232.6610.01

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

All Word - NQ Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.13
  • 5-Year: 0.62
  • 10-Year: 0.94
  • All Time: 0.72

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of All Word - NQ compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

All Word - NQ provided a 0.00% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Monthly Dividends

The table below shows the monthly dividends paid by this portfolio.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2024$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2023$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2022$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2021$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the All Word - NQ. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the All Word - NQ was 52.43%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 511 trading sessions.

The current All Word - NQ drawdown is 7.98%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-52.43%Nov 1, 2007245Nov 21, 2008511Dec 16, 2010756
-34.94%Nov 23, 2021282Dec 28, 2022247Dec 13, 2023529
-28.88%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202050Jun 5, 202073
-23.07%Feb 18, 202537Apr 9, 202551Jun 24, 202588
-19.84%Oct 2, 201859Dec 27, 201879Apr 23, 2019138

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 1 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkLYMS.DEPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.520.52
LYMS.DE0.521.001.00
Portfolio0.521.001.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Mar 14, 2007