Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 20% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | Communication Services | 13.33% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | Communication Services | 13.33% |
AAPL Apple Inc | Technology | 13.33% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 13.33% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | Technology | 13.33% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | Technology | 13.33% |
Find the right asset allocation for 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.30% | 0.09% | 8.18% | 8.17% | 23.42% | 19.88% | 11.91% | 13.45% |
Portfolio 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 | 0.42% | -3.07% | -3.60% | -4.00% | 29.30% | 45.43% | 31.92% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AAPL Apple Inc | -1.89% | 2.90% | 11.12% | 8.71% | 48.46% | 19.11% | 19.46% | 29.63% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | -1.20% | -8.98% | 15.25% | 15.01% | 107.32% | 43.67% | 23.94% | 26.05% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -1.28% | -3.98% | -11.24% | -12.06% | -15.84% | 30.58% | 12.31% | 17.60% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -1.18% | -0.60% | -14.48% | -15.77% | -11.77% | 8.85% | 11.09% | 24.64% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1.73% | -2.94% | 12.01% | 12.58% | 47.43% | 75.35% | 64.54% | 68.47% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.69% | -0.97% | -23.22% | -24.81% | 6.85% | 108.67% | 41.37% | — |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 4.59% | -4.53% | -9.07% | -6.97% | 38.56% | 18.72% | 15.43% | 39.56% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 30, 2020, 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2's average daily return is +0.15%, while the average monthly return is +3.07%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.9 years.
Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +36.6%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -17.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +16.1%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -7.2%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -2.73% | -6.42% | -5.03% | 9.41% | 8.49% | -6.06% | -3.60% | ||||||
| 2025 | 2.30% | -7.42% | -8.82% | 7.01% | 14.15% | 4.36% | 6.24% | 2.78% | 13.19% | 4.39% | -3.38% | 1.53% | 39.35% |
| 2024 | -0.80% | 16.91% | 0.00% | -1.84% | 7.30% | 10.17% | 1.99% | 1.89% | 9.91% | 1.08% | 18.03% | 8.30% | 98.61% |
| 2023 | 22.26% | 8.76% | 11.84% | -1.86% | 25.32% | 9.63% | 8.52% | -5.08% | -3.48% | -5.53% | 15.55% | 0.94% | 119.65% |
| 2022 | -10.73% | -8.86% | 10.54% | -17.66% | -6.17% | -8.90% | 15.46% | -9.13% | -9.57% | -3.27% | 3.54% | -13.75% | -48.11% |
| 2021 | 9.10% | -7.50% | 1.57% | 8.23% | -1.88% | 10.75% | 0.49% | 9.08% | -5.41% | 16.90% | 2.99% | -3.11% | 45.82% |
Benchmark Metrics
2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 has an annualized alpha of 13.04%, beta of 1.64, and R2 of 0.68 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 30, 2020.
- This portfolio captured 197.22% of S&P 500 Index gains and 110.69% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 13.04% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Beta of 1.64 means this portfolio moves significantly more than S&P 500 Index - expect amplified gains in rallies and amplified losses in downturns.
- Alpha
- 13.04%
- Beta
- 1.64
- R²
- 0.68
- Upside Capture
- 197.22%
- Downside Capture
- 110.69%
Expense Ratio
2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 ranks 16 for risk / return — in the bottom 16% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.94 | -0.61 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 2.63 | -0.78 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.59 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 11.84 | -7.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 88 | 2.18 | 3.09 | 1.39 | 3.53 | 8.89 |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 96 | 3.76 | 5.15 | 1.61 | 5.20 | 18.68 |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 23 | -0.45 | -0.44 | 0.94 | -0.48 | -1.01 |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 24 | -0.47 | -0.49 | 0.94 | -0.35 | -0.73 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 77 | 1.37 | 1.94 | 1.24 | 2.36 | 5.73 |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 45 | 0.14 | 0.53 | 1.07 | 0.18 | 0.33 |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 66 | 0.87 | 1.43 | 1.17 | 1.29 | 3.01 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 provided a 0.27% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.27% | 0.22% | 0.24% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.73% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 was 53.14%, occurring on Dec 28, 2022. Recovery took 128 trading sessions.
The current 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 drawdown is 7.63%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bear market2022 | -53.14%Dec 2022 | 1y 1mo | 6mo 9d | 1y 8moNov 2021 - Jul 2023 |
2025 selloff2025 | -29.75%Apr 2025 | 1mo 18d | 2mo 16d | 4mo 4dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025 |
2026 bear market2026 | -21.02%Mar 2026 | 5mo 1d | — | 7mo 12dOct 2025 - now |
2021 bear market2021 | -20.01%Mar 2021 | 26d | 3mo 17d | 4mo 13dFeb 2021 - Jun 2021 |
2024 correction2024 | -17.77%Aug 2024 | 25d | 1mo 21d | 2mo 16dJul 2024 - Sep 2024 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 7 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.82, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.58 | 1.42 | 1.35 | 1.36 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.36, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.80 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.72, while PLTR has the lowest at 0.52.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 2025 STATIC PROJECTION - 2 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification