PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
test1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for test1

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 6, 2026, the test1 returned 16.14% Year-To-Date and 18.95% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-2.64%0.25%7.86%7.47%
Portfolio
test1
-3.24%2.91%16.14%15.08%38.64%26.16%15.60%18.95%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
-0.07%3.93%15.71%14.10%39.89%27.54%15.15%19.27%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
-6.14%5.22%22.48%20.33%49.26%30.47%20.48%24.81%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-3.07%-0.89%9.20%9.69%25.79%19.73%10.38%12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 27, 2008, test1's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.25%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.6 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Apr 2026 with a return of +14.4%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -19.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, test1 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +12.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.08%-1.49%-4.95%14.37%10.37%-2.79%16.14%
20251.28%-2.41%-6.93%0.91%8.63%6.99%3.00%1.83%5.46%4.35%-2.21%0.25%22.07%
20241.04%5.18%2.16%-4.55%6.55%5.25%-0.09%1.38%2.43%-1.14%5.78%-0.74%25.16%
20239.36%-1.19%6.54%0.40%4.41%6.23%3.54%-2.34%-5.47%-2.42%11.07%5.22%39.75%
2022-7.13%-3.50%2.88%-11.06%-1.00%-8.73%10.92%-4.75%-10.57%5.94%6.06%-6.99%-26.84%
20210.15%1.71%1.37%4.92%-0.40%4.69%1.74%3.29%-5.06%6.89%0.35%2.35%23.74%

Benchmark Metrics

test1 has an annualized alpha of 5.42%, beta of 1.29, and R2 of 0.93 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 27, 2008.

  • This portfolio captured 150.13% of S&P 500 Index gains and 103.79% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 5.42% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
5.42%
Beta
1.29
0.93
Upside Capture
150.13%
Downside Capture
103.79%

Expense Ratio

test1 has an expense ratio of 0.15%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

test1 ranks 50 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


test1 Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
test1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
test1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
test1 Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
test1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
test1 Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for test1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
642.403.151.412.9911.76
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
632.302.841.383.029.59
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
601.982.701.362.6811.87

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

test1 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 6, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.38
  • 5-Year: 0.75
  • 10-Year: 0.91
  • All Time: 0.66

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.68 to 2.61, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of test1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

test1 provided a 0.80% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.80%0.91%1.05%1.13%1.33%0.97%1.05%2.60%1.91%1.04%1.57%1.74%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.44%0.51%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%4.41%1.93%0.03%1.01%1.50%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.64%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the test1 was 47.65%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 270 trading sessions.

The current test1 drawdown is 4.55%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-47.65%Mar 2009
6mo 29d1y 27d
1y 7moAug 2008 - Apr 2010
COVID crash2020
-31.97%Mar 2020
1mo 2d3mo 11d
4mo 13dFeb 2020 - Jul 2020
Bear market2022
-31.93%Oct 2022
9mo 20d1y 2mo
1y 11moDec 2021 - Dec 2023
2025 selloff2025
-22.42%Apr 2025
1mo 18d2mo 17d
4mo 5dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-21.41%Dec 2018
3mo 26d3mo 12d
7mo 8dAug 2018 - Apr 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.04

1.03

1.02

1.02

1.03

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.03, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

test1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

test1 has a 0.95 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.95


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.96, while VGT has the lowest at 0.86.

VGT
0.86
FNCMX
0.94
VT
0.96

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. test1. FNCMX has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.98, while VT has the lowest at 0.93.

VT
0.93
VGT
0.97
FNCMX
0.98

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

VTVGTFNCMX
VT1.000.840.88
VGT0.841.000.96
FNCMX0.880.961.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jun 27, 2008
Diversification Analysis

Find what test1 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where test1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification