PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2 Log Sharpe 2
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 2 Log Sharpe 2

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2 Log Sharpe 2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 6, 2026, the 2 Log Sharpe 2 returned 3.80% Year-To-Date and 25.17% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
2 Log Sharpe 2
-0.38%1.23%3.80%4.66%15.31%25.10%22.42%25.17%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-1.89%2.90%11.12%8.71%48.46%19.11%19.46%29.63%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.14%7.72%128.95%121.76%322.01%57.74%43.72%60.51%
CB
Chubb Limited
-1.35%0.70%3.43%8.96%10.97%20.64%15.72%11.89%
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
-1.84%0.46%-0.07%1.71%9.89%19.76%8.67%11.63%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.30%-3.37%13.35%10.14%-3.42%25.18%22.05%22.25%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
-3.45%4.28%-7.21%-4.62%-23.00%14.08%15.90%23.37%
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
-0.15%-3.08%-24.40%-24.39%-31.90%3.21%-5.43%10.76%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.82%0.41%27.32%18.09%23.03%30.80%24.42%23.50%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.26%-8.41%0.24%3.07%30.18%29.71%17.55%12.56%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
1.57%21.37%7.29%15.58%50.32%38.07%39.75%33.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Nov 19, 2004, 2 Log Sharpe 2's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.61%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.6 years.

Historically, 71% of months were positive and 29% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +12.6%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -13.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, 2 Log Sharpe 2 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +10.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -10.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.68%2.42%-6.64%5.94%0.83%-0.06%3.80%
20253.66%3.46%-2.06%2.43%0.50%2.08%0.17%2.05%5.42%-0.95%3.49%-0.46%21.36%
20244.40%6.87%5.52%-2.31%5.08%4.10%1.66%4.82%1.51%-1.38%5.46%-6.23%32.73%
20234.14%-0.54%6.65%2.98%2.60%6.02%1.64%2.50%-3.18%3.01%5.97%2.38%39.48%
2022-6.75%-0.44%5.46%-6.36%0.33%-3.76%7.25%-4.75%-4.80%8.90%6.83%-3.88%-3.73%
2021-0.64%0.06%2.39%5.19%3.06%5.18%3.14%3.76%-5.69%8.87%1.67%5.35%36.59%

Benchmark Metrics

2 Log Sharpe 2 has an annualized alpha of 12.35%, beta of 0.79, and R2 of 0.85 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since November 19, 2004.

  • This portfolio captured 108.23% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 53.85% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 12.35% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
12.35%
Beta
0.79
0.85
Upside Capture
108.23%
Downside Capture
53.85%

Expense Ratio

2 Log Sharpe 2 has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

2 Log Sharpe 2 ranks 21 for risk / return — below 21% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


2 Log Sharpe 2 Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
2 Log Sharpe 2 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2 Log Sharpe 2 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
2 Log Sharpe 2 Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
2 Log Sharpe 2 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
2 Log Sharpe 2 Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2 Log Sharpe 2 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.94

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.63

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.59

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

11.84

-4.55


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
882.183.091.393.538.89
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
974.914.511.6011.6924.15
CB
Chubb Limited
610.621.031.121.182.70
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
570.500.831.100.952.47
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
32-0.18-0.130.98-0.22-0.51
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
6-1.16-1.580.82-0.85-1.49
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
4-1.24-1.760.80-0.87-1.81
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
630.711.141.141.212.63
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
331.131.511.231.513.78
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
771.331.901.262.145.32

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

2 Log Sharpe 2 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 6, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.48
  • 5-Year: 1.62
  • 10-Year: 1.64
  • All Time: 1.25

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.63 to 2.51, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 2 Log Sharpe 2 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

2 Log Sharpe 2 provided a 1.06% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.06%0.81%0.69%0.85%1.42%1.20%1.44%1.22%1.33%1.41%1.54%1.69%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CB
Chubb Limited
1.21%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
2.19%2.13%2.25%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.33%2.53%3.89%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
1.04%0.89%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.99%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
2.30%1.67%1.44%1.17%1.27%0.67%0.81%0.89%0.89%0.97%0.95%1.11%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.06%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2 Log Sharpe 2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 2 Log Sharpe 2 was 42.34%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 245 trading sessions.

The current 2 Log Sharpe 2 drawdown is 0.74%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-42.34%Nov 2008
10mo 29d11mo 26d
1y 10moDec 2007 - Nov 2009
COVID crash2020
-25.63%Mar 2020
1mo 1d2mo 10d
3mo 11dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
Bear market2022
-15.49%Jun 2022
5mo 19d5mo 17d
11mo 6dDec 2021 - Dec 2022
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-15.26%Dec 2018
2mo 29d2mo
4mo 29dSep 2018 - Feb 2019
2006 correction2006
-11.78%Jul 2006
3mo 12d2mo 10d
5mo 22dApr 2006 - Sep 2006

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 19 assets, with an effective number of assets of 13.86, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

2.58

2.18

1.90

1.76

1.71

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.71, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

2 Log Sharpe 2 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

2 Log Sharpe 2 has a 0.62 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.87


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. ETN has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.70, while GLD has the lowest at 0.07.

GLD
0.07
RGR
0.35
WMT
0.43
DPZ
0.44
UNH
0.46
ORLY
0.47
LLY
0.48
PGR
0.51
AMD
0.52
CB
0.54
TJX
0.55
COST
0.55
TOL
0.56
NVDA
0.59
AAPL
0.59
CINF
0.63
CTAS
0.68
MSFT
0.68
ETN
0.70

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 2 Log Sharpe 2. CTAS has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.73, while GLD has the lowest at 0.16.

GLD
0.16
RGR
0.43
UNH
0.47
WMT
0.48
AMD
0.49
DPZ
0.51
CB
0.53
PGR
0.54
TOL
0.55
LLY
0.55
TJX
0.59
CINF
0.59
AAPL
0.60
NVDA
0.60
COST
0.60
ORLY
0.60
ETN
0.62
MSFT
0.68
CTAS
0.73

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

GLDRGRUNHAMDLLYDPZWMTNVDAAAPLORLYPGRTOLCBTJXCOSTMSFTETNCINFCTAS
GLD1.000.050.000.050.010.01-0.010.040.02-0.02-0.010.05-0.00-0.030.000.020.05-0.01-0.01
RGR0.051.000.180.200.170.220.190.200.210.220.220.290.230.280.230.210.280.280.28
UNH0.000.181.000.200.330.250.260.210.260.300.330.260.350.300.300.300.330.360.36
AMD0.050.200.201.000.220.260.180.560.390.230.200.320.200.270.280.420.380.250.35
LLY0.010.170.330.221.000.260.310.240.250.290.310.240.320.290.330.340.330.350.37
DPZ0.010.220.250.260.261.000.270.290.290.340.260.330.270.340.340.320.320.310.39
WMT-0.010.190.260.180.310.271.000.200.240.370.330.270.350.400.560.300.300.360.36
NVDA0.040.200.210.560.240.290.201.000.440.270.230.340.210.290.320.500.420.260.39
AAPL0.020.210.260.390.250.290.240.441.000.300.270.340.260.310.350.490.380.310.40
ORLY-0.020.220.300.230.290.340.370.270.301.000.350.350.360.470.430.320.340.390.45
PGR-0.010.220.330.200.310.260.330.230.270.351.000.330.550.350.370.330.370.580.43
TOL0.050.290.260.320.240.330.270.340.340.350.331.000.350.390.340.330.450.410.42
CB-0.000.230.350.200.320.270.350.210.260.360.550.351.000.400.360.320.410.680.45
TJX-0.030.280.300.270.290.340.400.290.310.470.350.390.401.000.470.350.410.440.47
COST0.000.230.300.280.330.340.560.320.350.430.370.340.360.471.000.410.360.390.45
MSFT0.020.210.300.420.340.320.300.500.490.320.330.330.320.350.411.000.430.370.49
ETN0.050.280.330.380.330.320.300.420.380.340.370.450.410.410.360.431.000.480.52
CINF-0.010.280.360.250.350.310.360.260.310.390.580.410.680.440.390.370.481.000.52
CTAS-0.010.280.360.350.370.390.360.390.400.450.430.420.450.470.450.490.520.521.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Nov 19, 2004
Diversification Analysis

Find what 2 Log Sharpe 2 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 2 Log Sharpe 2 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification