PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFTs Held
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for EFTs Held

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of CA$10,000 in EFTs Held, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.57%2.17%10.16%9.03%25.93%21.59%15.11%14.49%
Portfolio
EFTs Held
0.67%2.98%9.90%9.99%33.32%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
0.00%5.50%19.56%23.84%57.45%33.13%
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
1.50%0.07%5.99%2.29%29.86%
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
1.09%1.51%12.41%12.80%35.43%22.66%
LIFE.TO
Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund
-1.16%3.91%-6.61%-5.35%3.37%3.66%4.70%
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
1.57%4.37%17.22%15.25%39.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 17, 2025, EFTs Held's average daily return is +0.09%, while the average monthly return is +1.73%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.4 years.

Historically, 56% of months were positive and 44% were negative. The best month was Apr 2026 with a return of +9.1%, while the worst month was Mar 2025 at -5.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, EFTs Held closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +9.4%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -5.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-0.66%-0.68%-4.10%9.12%8.24%-1.66%9.90%
20252.94%-2.20%-5.64%-0.98%5.86%5.06%2.83%1.65%5.36%5.30%1.54%-0.90%22.09%

Benchmark Metrics

EFTs Held has an annualized alpha of 6.03%, beta of 0.91, and R2 of 0.82 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 17, 2025.

  • This portfolio captured 107.68% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 83.26% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 6.03% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 0.91 and R2 of 0.82, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
6.03%
Beta
0.91
0.82
Upside Capture
107.68%
Downside Capture
83.26%

Expense Ratio

EFTs Held has an expense ratio of 0.76%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

EFTs Held ranks 74 for risk / return — better than 74% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


EFTs Held Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EFTs Held Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFTs Held Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFTs Held Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EFTs Held Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFTs Held Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for EFTs Held and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.58

2.07

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

3.49

2.85

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.84

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

10.60

+2.01


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
974.746.481.886.9830.81
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
331.271.761.231.233.05
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
742.263.011.412.9612.99
LIFE.TO
Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund
130.240.461.050.250.66
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
802.423.111.443.6913.69

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

EFTs Held Sharpe ratios as of Jun 6, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.58
  • All Time: 1.29

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.63 to 2.52, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of EFTs Held compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

EFTs Held provided a 15.74% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
Portfolio15.74%14.99%10.04%7.73%6.35%1.29%1.42%1.27%0.97%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
12.78%13.73%15.28%13.60%10.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
27.46%22.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
11.56%11.98%12.13%12.11%13.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIFE.TO
Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund
13.35%11.83%10.90%9.24%8.20%6.46%7.09%6.33%4.84%
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
13.56%14.54%11.87%3.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the EFTs Held. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the EFTs Held was 19.89%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 55 trading sessions.

The current EFTs Held drawdown is 0.05%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

2025 selloff2025
-19.89%Apr 2025
1mo 18d2mo 19d
4mo 7dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025
2026 correction2026
-10.58%Mar 2026
2mo 16d18d
3mo 4dJan 2026 - Apr 2026
2025 pullback2025
-4.39%Nov 2025
7d6d
13dNov 2025 - Nov 2025
2025 pullback2025
-2.92%Dec 2025
19d20d
1mo 9dNov 2025 - Jan 2026
2025 pullback2025
-2.50%Oct 2025
0s10d
10dOct 2025 - Oct 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.26

1.18

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.18, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

EFTs Held correlation to the S&P 500 Index

EFTs Held has a 0.84 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025

0.81


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. HYLD.TO has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.83, while LIFE.TO has the lowest at 0.34.

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. EFTs Held. HYLD.TO has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.91, while LIFE.TO has the lowest at 0.46.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

LIFE.TOBANK.TOHHIS.TOQQCL.TOHYLD.TO
LIFE.TO1.000.390.170.240.35
BANK.TO0.391.000.420.480.56
HHIS.TO0.170.421.000.810.80
QQCL.TO0.240.480.811.000.81
HYLD.TO0.350.560.800.811.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 17, 2025
Diversification Analysis

Find what EFTs Held is missing

See which holdings overlap, where EFTs Held is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification