PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4F
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 4F

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 4F, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 9, 2026, the 4F returned -3.71% Year-To-Date and 27.02% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
4F
0.22%2.85%-3.71%-1.67%12.68%30.62%21.85%27.02%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
-0.36%-3.82%-11.14%-6.37%-2.88%22.38%19.80%28.04%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
0.97%0.49%-20.44%-20.82%-24.22%14.73%20.40%29.88%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
0.61%12.08%20.04%21.74%73.62%49.42%25.24%23.96%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-0.40%2.98%-2.52%-0.35%19.35%33.18%16.72%20.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 2, 2014, 4F's average daily return is +0.09%, while the average monthly return is +1.87%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.1 years.

Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was Oct 2022 with a return of +20.1%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -18.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, 4F closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +17.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-3.16%-13.93%0.10%9.82%4.09%0.98%-3.71%
20259.86%-7.26%-10.32%1.07%5.74%10.35%3.61%-0.99%-0.17%-3.83%4.23%5.95%17.20%
20243.13%7.50%4.02%-1.27%6.56%-0.95%9.82%-1.29%1.17%8.18%14.61%-3.74%57.29%
202310.95%-0.94%-5.30%4.30%-0.36%8.41%7.26%-0.83%0.29%-6.87%14.61%7.52%43.57%
2022-4.53%-3.17%-2.57%-14.38%10.53%-14.60%14.88%0.26%-13.30%20.14%12.89%-8.48%-9.78%
2021-1.32%14.16%2.71%4.77%5.82%5.39%1.05%6.72%-2.06%13.38%-6.49%0.99%52.90%

Benchmark Metrics

4F has an annualized alpha of 7.56%, beta of 1.21, and R2 of 0.65 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 02, 2014.

  • This portfolio captured 151.64% of S&P 500 Index gains and 111.53% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 7.56% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
7.56%
Beta
1.21
0.65
Upside Capture
151.64%
Downside Capture
111.53%

Expense Ratio

4F has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

4F ranks 8 for risk / return — in the bottom 8% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


4F Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
4F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4F Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
4F Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
4F Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
4F Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 4F and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.51

1.94

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.83

2.63

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.59

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

11.84

-10.72


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
37-0.080.131.02-0.08-0.17
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
20-0.59-0.620.92-0.50-0.98
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
912.643.241.433.8112.74
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
660.901.301.171.262.98

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

4F Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.51
  • 5-Year: 0.81
  • 10-Year: 0.99
  • All Time: 0.82

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.59 to 2.46, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 4F compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

4F provided a 2.39% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.39%2.00%1.78%2.38%2.92%2.31%3.21%3.00%4.95%3.56%3.50%5.92%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
1.64%1.38%1.10%1.81%2.51%2.90%4.72%4.23%7.86%5.53%6.46%12.91%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.38%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.63%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 4F. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 4F was 45.02%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 172 trading sessions.

The current 4F drawdown is 9.88%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-45.02%Mar 2020
1mo 29d8mo 6d
10mo 5dJan 2020 - Nov 2020
2016 bear market2016
-34.77%Feb 2016
7mo 22d9mo 3d
1y 4moJun 2015 - Nov 2016
Bear market2022
-34.28%Jun 2022
7mo 22d1y 27d
1y 8moOct 2021 - Jul 2023
2025 selloff2025
-31.17%Apr 2025
2mo 3d3mo
5mo 3dJan 2025 - Jul 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-29.79%Dec 2018
10mo6mo 9d
1y 4moFeb 2018 - Jul 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.24

1.17

1.17

1.20

1.21

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.21, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

4F correlation to the S&P 500 Index

4F has a 0.65 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.72


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. GS has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.67, while ARES has the lowest at 0.50.

ARES
0.50
APO
0.58
JPM
0.64
GS
0.67

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 4F. GS has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.80, while ARES has the lowest at 0.74.

ARES
0.74
JPM
0.76
APO
0.80
GS
0.80

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

ARESAPOJPMGS
ARES1.000.510.370.42
APO0.511.000.470.51
JPM0.370.471.000.78
GS0.420.510.781.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 2, 2014
Diversification Analysis

Find what 4F is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 4F is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification