Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | Technology | 5.60% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | Technology | 8.20% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 0.30% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | S&P 500 | 13% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Technology Equities | 34% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | S&P 500 | 38.90% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Lilly Existing, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 9, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of VOO
Returns By Period
As of Apr 3, 2026, the Lilly Existing returned -5.84% Year-To-Date and 18.52% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio Lilly Existing | 0.45% | -2.95% | -5.84% | -5.07% | 20.50% | 19.89% | 13.58% | 18.52% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 0.11% | -3.33% | -3.55% | -1.41% | 17.60% | 18.47% | 11.96% | 14.19% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.85% | -1.42% | -5.36% | -5.79% | 29.79% | 23.50% | 15.02% | 21.67% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.09% | -3.34% | -3.56% | -1.44% | 17.51% | 18.37% | 11.88% | 14.11% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 1.11% | -7.54% | -22.60% | -27.29% | -1.52% | 10.00% | 9.94% | 22.58% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.11% | -2.97% | -5.78% | -0.28% | 14.80% | 16.04% | 16.39% | 26.10% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.93% | -1.47% | -4.88% | -6.08% | 60.69% | 85.17% | 66.71% | 70.07% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 10, 2010, Lilly Existing's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.45%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.0 years.
Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +13.5%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -10.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, Lilly Existing closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +11.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.6%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.66% | -1.95% | -4.59% | 1.32% | -5.84% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 0.64% | -1.84% | -6.97% | 0.19% | 7.98% | 6.85% | 3.28% | 1.63% | 5.10% | 3.73% | -1.93% | -0.12% | 19.09% |
| 2024 | 1.84% | 4.71% | 2.17% | -4.67% | 6.72% | 5.80% | -0.13% | 1.79% | 2.27% | -1.33% | 6.07% | -0.94% | 26.40% |
| 2023 | 7.56% | -0.83% | 7.32% | 1.43% | 4.06% | 6.34% | 2.67% | -1.99% | -5.51% | -1.16% | 10.99% | 4.04% | 39.42% |
| 2022 | -6.14% | -3.63% | 3.71% | -10.04% | -0.87% | -8.44% | 11.19% | -4.83% | -10.43% | 7.36% | 5.38% | -6.88% | -23.53% |
| 2021 | -0.45% | 1.54% | 2.82% | 5.53% | -0.41% | 4.97% | 3.20% | 3.52% | -5.33% | 8.28% | 1.34% | 3.72% | 32.00% |
Benchmark Metrics
Lilly Existing has an annualized alpha of 4.14%, beta of 1.08, and R² of 0.95 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 10, 2010.
- This portfolio captured 120.71% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 96.73% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 4.14% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- With beta of 1.08 and R² of 0.95, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 4.14%
- Beta
- 1.08
- R²
- 0.95
- Upside Capture
- 120.71%
- Downside Capture
- 96.73%
Expense Ratio
Lilly Existing has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Lilly Existing ranks 29 for risk / return — below 29% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.88 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.39 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 6.43 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 54 | 0.98 | 1.49 | 1.23 | 1.53 | 7.13 |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 58 | 1.10 | 1.67 | 1.23 | 1.88 | 5.72 |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 53 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.22 | 1.51 | 7.11 |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 35 | -0.06 | 0.11 | 1.01 | -0.05 | -0.12 |
AAPL Apple Inc | 55 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 1.13 | 0.66 | 2.04 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 81 | 1.47 | 2.17 | 1.27 | 3.02 | 7.54 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Lilly Existing provided a 0.85% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.85% | 0.79% | 0.93% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 1.49% | 1.75% | 1.50% | 1.80% | 1.82% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.93% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Lilly Existing. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Lilly Existing was 32.42%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 72 trading sessions.
The current Lilly Existing drawdown is 8.79%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -32.42% | Feb 20, 2020 | 23 | Mar 23, 2020 | 72 | Jul 6, 2020 | 95 |
| -28.98% | Dec 28, 2021 | 200 | Oct 12, 2022 | 190 | Jul 18, 2023 | 390 |
| -22% | Dec 17, 2024 | 76 | Apr 8, 2025 | 52 | Jun 24, 2025 | 128 |
| -21.8% | Oct 4, 2018 | 56 | Dec 24, 2018 | 70 | Apr 5, 2019 | 126 |
| -16.2% | Jul 25, 2011 | 20 | Aug 19, 2011 | 104 | Jan 19, 2012 | 124 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.40, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | NVDA | AAPL | MSFT | SPY | VOO | VGT | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| NVDA | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| AAPL | 0.62 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| MSFT | 0.71 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| SPY | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| VOO | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| VGT | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.98 |
| Portfolio | 0.95 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1.00 |