PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Lilly Existing
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


VOO 38.90%VGT 34.00%SPY 13.00%MSFT 8.20%AAPL 5.60%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Lilly Existing

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Lilly Existing, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 9, 2026, the Lilly Existing returned 12.41% Year-To-Date and 20.67% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
Lilly Existing
0.57%1.81%12.41%11.16%31.63%24.17%16.66%20.67%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-1.89%2.90%11.12%8.71%48.46%19.11%19.46%29.63%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-1.18%-0.60%-14.48%-15.77%-11.77%8.85%11.09%24.64%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
1.73%-2.94%12.01%12.58%47.43%75.35%64.54%68.47%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.23%0.22%8.70%8.75%24.79%21.35%13.42%15.27%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
1.71%4.28%24.57%21.33%50.38%31.24%20.82%25.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.25%0.24%8.72%8.77%24.91%21.45%13.49%15.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 9, 2010, Lilly Existing's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.54%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.8 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +13.5%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -10.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, Lilly Existing closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +11.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-0.66%-1.95%-4.59%12.98%10.56%-3.17%12.41%
20250.64%-1.84%-6.97%0.19%7.98%6.85%3.28%1.63%5.10%3.73%-1.93%-0.12%19.09%
20241.84%4.71%2.17%-4.67%6.72%5.80%-0.13%1.79%2.27%-1.33%6.07%-0.94%26.40%
20237.56%-0.83%7.32%1.43%4.06%6.34%2.67%-1.99%-5.51%-1.16%10.99%4.04%39.42%
2022-6.14%-3.63%3.71%-10.04%-0.87%-8.44%11.19%-4.83%-10.43%7.36%5.38%-6.88%-23.53%
2021-0.45%1.54%2.82%5.53%-0.41%4.97%3.20%3.52%-5.33%8.28%1.34%3.72%32.00%

Benchmark Metrics

Lilly Existing has an annualized alpha of 4.36%, beta of 1.08, and R2 of 0.95 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 09, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 121.98% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 97.09% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 4.36% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.08 and R2 of 0.95, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
4.36%
Beta
1.08
0.95
Upside Capture
121.98%
Downside Capture
97.09%

Expense Ratio

Lilly Existing has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Lilly Existing ranks 42 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Lilly Existing Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
Lilly Existing Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Lilly Existing Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
Lilly Existing Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
Lilly Existing Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
Lilly Existing Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lilly Existing and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.11

1.94

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.63

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.59

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

11.84

-2.97


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
882.183.091.393.538.89
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
24-0.47-0.490.94-0.35-0.73
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
771.371.941.242.365.73
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
692.062.781.382.8012.93
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
712.352.891.393.099.77
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
692.082.801.382.8112.97

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Lilly Existing Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.11
  • 5-Year: 0.83
  • 10-Year: 1.00
  • All Time: 0.98

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.59 to 2.46, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Lilly Existing compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Lilly Existing provided a 0.74% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.74%0.79%0.93%1.06%1.31%0.94%1.19%1.49%1.75%1.50%1.80%1.82%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.86%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Lilly Existing. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Lilly Existing was 32.42%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 72 trading sessions.

The current Lilly Existing drawdown is 4.68%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-32.42%Mar 2020
1mo 2d3mo 15d
4mo 17dFeb 2020 - Jul 2020
Bear market2022
-28.98%Oct 2022
9mo 18d9mo 9d
1y 6moDec 2021 - Jul 2023
2025 selloff2025
-22.00%Apr 2025
3mo 22d2mo 17d
6mo 9dDec 2024 - Jun 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-21.80%Dec 2018
2mo 21d3mo 12d
6mo 3dOct 2018 - Apr 2019
2011 correction2011
-16.20%Aug 2011
25d5mo 3d
5mo 28dJul 2011 - Jan 2012

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.40, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.13

1.08

1.06

1.05

1.06

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.06, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

Lilly Existing correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Lilly Existing has a 0.94 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.95


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SPY has the highest benchmark correlation at 1.00, while NVDA has the lowest at 0.61.

NVDA
0.61
AAPL
0.62
MSFT
0.70
VGT
0.89
VOO
1.00
SPY
1.00

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Lilly Existing. VGT has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.98, while NVDA has the lowest at 0.68.

NVDA
0.68
AAPL
0.72
MSFT
0.80
SPY
0.95
VOO
0.95
VGT
0.98

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 9, 2010
Diversification Analysis

Find what Lilly Existing is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Lilly Existing is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification