PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
12 test
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


NDAQ 60.00%VOO 20.00%VGT 20.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 12 test

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 12 test, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 9, 2026, the 12 test returned 0.26% Year-To-Date and 18.57% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
12 test
0.15%-0.28%0.26%4.61%16.34%20.89%13.89%18.57%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
-0.57%-2.40%-10.37%-3.06%2.60%16.10%10.50%16.58%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
1.71%4.28%24.57%21.33%50.38%31.24%20.82%25.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.25%0.24%8.72%8.77%24.91%21.45%13.49%15.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 9, 2010, 12 test's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.62%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.6 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Jul 2022 with a return of +15.7%, while the worst month was Jan 2022 at -11.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, 12 test closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +12.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-0.01%-6.48%-3.50%10.77%5.22%-4.67%0.26%
20254.28%-0.48%-7.82%0.37%9.11%7.38%5.84%-0.35%-1.70%-0.27%2.62%4.38%24.60%
20240.35%0.42%8.33%-5.02%1.79%3.89%7.33%4.73%1.85%0.42%9.94%-4.49%32.34%
20232.08%-4.36%1.79%1.03%1.75%-3.09%2.01%1.56%-6.47%0.46%12.06%4.62%12.98%
2022-11.43%-4.14%4.06%-11.14%-1.08%-4.41%15.68%-2.67%-6.77%9.00%8.20%-8.86%-16.23%
20210.81%2.19%5.34%7.81%2.11%5.11%4.89%4.21%-2.73%8.29%-1.43%3.58%47.61%

Benchmark Metrics

12 test has an annualized alpha of 6.43%, beta of 1.03, and R2 of 0.71 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 09, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 115.26% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 83.65% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 6.43% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.03 and R2 of 0.71, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
6.43%
Beta
1.03
0.71
Upside Capture
115.26%
Downside Capture
83.65%

Expense Ratio

12 test has an expense ratio of 0.02%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

12 test ranks 12 for risk / return — in the bottom 12% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


12 test Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
12 test Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
12 test Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
12 test Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
12 test Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
12 test Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 12 test and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.94

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.28

2.63

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.59

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

11.84

-8.78


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
420.110.301.040.120.28
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
712.352.891.393.099.77
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
692.082.801.382.8112.97

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

12 test Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.93
  • 5-Year: 0.69
  • 10-Year: 0.89
  • All Time: 0.95

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.59 to 2.46, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 12 test compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

12 test provided a 1.02% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.02%0.95%1.10%1.31%1.28%0.98%1.35%1.64%1.92%1.69%1.75%1.61%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.24%1.08%1.22%1.48%1.27%1.00%1.46%1.73%2.08%1.90%1.80%1.55%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 12 test. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 12 test was 35.39%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 50 trading sessions.

The current 12 test drawdown is 5.48%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-35.39%Mar 2020
1mo 17d2mo 12d
3mo 29dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
Bear market2022
-28.32%Jun 2022
5mo 16d1y 9mo
2y 2moDec 2021 - Mar 2024
2011 bear market2011
-25.60%Aug 2011
5mo 24d1y 5mo
1y 11moFeb 2011 - Jan 2013
2025 selloff2025
-20.81%Apr 2025
2mo1mo 29d
3mo 29dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-19.94%Dec 2018
3mo 20d4mo 7d
7mo 27dSep 2018 - Apr 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.27, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.20

1.16

1.13

1.10

1.10

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.10, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

12 test correlation to the S&P 500 Index

12 test has a 0.70 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.79


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VOO has the highest benchmark correlation at 1.00, while NDAQ has the lowest at 0.61.

NDAQ
0.61
VGT
0.89
VOO
1.00

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 12 test. NDAQ has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.95, while VGT has the lowest at 0.74.

VGT
0.74
VOO
0.79
NDAQ
0.95

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

NDAQVGTVOO
NDAQ1.000.530.61
VGT0.531.000.89
VOO0.610.891.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 9, 2010
Diversification Analysis

Find what 12 test is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 12 test is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification