Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 26.47% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | Healthcare | 16.14% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | Healthcare | 13.77% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | Consumer Defensive | 13.13% |
URI United Rentals, Inc. | Industrials | 12.76% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | Technology | 8.87% |
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company | Healthcare | 8.87% |
Find the right asset allocation for GRAP-1
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in GRAP-1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 13, 2026, the GRAP-1 returned 18.64% Year-To-Date and 41.87% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | 0.31% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 24.33% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio GRAP-1 | -0.18% | 5.69% | 18.64% | 20.90% | 47.77% | 44.73% | 42.19% | 41.87% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 2.64% | 30.08% | 121.28% | 119.38% | 234.96% | 60.05% | 34.02% | 38.86% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.68% | -6.35% | 14.24% | 11.38% | -0.24% | 25.12% | 22.12% | 22.27% |
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company | -2.49% | 25.61% | -19.78% | -21.65% | 0.36% | -14.16% | -7.53% | 8.27% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | -2.41% | 12.75% | 5.78% | 10.64% | 39.26% | 37.45% | 39.59% | 33.45% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | -0.40% | 3.20% | -4.23% | -3.47% | 8.11% | 26.04% | 32.74% | 16.64% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.16% | -8.83% | 10.16% | 17.38% | 44.72% | 71.13% | 63.13% | 67.95% |
URI United Rentals, Inc. | 0.54% | 11.77% | 33.31% | 31.84% | 55.90% | 39.18% | 29.54% | 31.88% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 22, 1999, GRAP-1's average daily return is +0.11%, while the average monthly return is +2.23%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.6 years.
Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was May 2003 with a return of +27.2%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -22.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.
On a daily basis, GRAP-1 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +14.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 14, 2000 at -16.0%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.20% | 1.08% | -6.86% | 9.64% | 5.99% | 5.07% | 18.64% | ||||||
| 2025 | 1.07% | 1.71% | -7.41% | 2.35% | 4.84% | 8.63% | 4.59% | 0.09% | 5.80% | 4.85% | 2.95% | -0.44% | 32.04% |
| 2024 | 10.55% | 17.69% | 6.37% | -3.52% | 11.95% | 6.75% | -1.06% | 2.09% | -1.84% | -1.43% | 5.95% | -6.45% | 54.56% |
| 2023 | 15.69% | 4.11% | 6.36% | 0.20% | 14.01% | 12.39% | 3.08% | 5.79% | -5.00% | -2.40% | 10.55% | 6.81% | 96.38% |
| 2022 | -10.02% | 0.75% | 9.97% | -12.39% | 0.55% | -7.65% | 14.52% | -8.84% | -9.47% | 11.27% | 12.30% | -8.09% | -11.95% |
| 2021 | 4.91% | 4.09% | 4.06% | 3.76% | 5.64% | 8.88% | 4.17% | 6.73% | -4.32% | 12.19% | 8.58% | 2.13% | 79.47% |
Benchmark Metrics
GRAP-1 has an annualized alpha of 19.49%, beta of 1.10, and R2 of 0.60 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 22, 1999.
- This portfolio captured 193.10% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 97.61% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 19.49% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- With beta of 1.10 and R2 of 0.60, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 19.49%
- Beta
- 1.10
- R²
- 0.60
- Upside Capture
- 193.10%
- Downside Capture
- 97.61%
Expense Ratio
GRAP-1 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
GRAP-1 ranks 80 for risk / return — better than 80% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for GRAP-1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 1.86 | +0.68 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 2.53 | +0.94 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 2.53 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 11.37 | +3.45 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 97 | 4.65 | 4.13 | 1.59 | 10.67 | 30.41 |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 36 | -0.08 | 0.02 | 1.00 | -0.10 | -0.22 |
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company | 43 | -0.01 | 0.51 | 1.09 | -0.01 | -0.02 |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 72 | 1.07 | 1.62 | 1.22 | 1.72 | 4.28 |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 49 | 0.27 | 0.63 | 1.08 | 0.29 | 0.74 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 74 | 1.20 | 1.75 | 1.21 | 2.07 | 4.94 |
URI United Rentals, Inc. | 75 | 1.23 | 2.02 | 1.27 | 1.71 | 3.67 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
GRAP-1 provided a 0.38% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.45% | 0.78% | 0.47% | 0.44% | 0.98% | 0.78% | 0.95% | 1.29% | 0.93% | 1.50% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.42% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
URI United Rentals, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the GRAP-1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the GRAP-1 was 64.12%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 539 trading sessions.
The current GRAP-1 drawdown is 0.31%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial crisis2007–2009 | -64.12%Nov 2008 | 1y 1mo | 2y 1mo | 3y 2moOct 2007 - Jan 2011 |
Dot-com crash2000–2002 | -57.74%Oct 2002 | 9mo 8d | 2y 11mo | 3y 8moJan 2002 - Sep 2005 |
2011 bear market2011 | -31.18%Aug 2011 | 5mo 21d | 1y 3mo | 1y 8moFeb 2011 - Nov 2012 |
COVID crash2020 | -30.03%Mar 2020 | 1mo 2d | 2mo | 3mo 2dFeb 2020 - May 2020 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -29.59%Dec 2018 | 2mo 21d | 10mo 4d | 1y 20dOct 2018 - Oct 2019 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 7 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.09, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 2.10 | 1.69 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 1.57 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.57, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
GRAP-1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.75 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. AMAT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.63, while ICLR has the lowest at 0.34.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what GRAP-1 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where GRAP-1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification