Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Global Equities | 50% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | Global Equities | 50% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in VWRA VS IWDA, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 26, 2019, corresponding to the inception date of VWRA.L
Returns By Period
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio VWRA VS IWDA | -0.54% | -2.31% | -2.42% | 0.93% | 20.17% | 17.23% | 10.00% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.45% | -2.26% | -2.76% | 0.57% | 19.47% | 17.32% | 10.44% | 12.08% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -0.63% | -2.35% | -2.07% | 1.29% | 20.86% | 17.14% | 9.56% | — |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 29, 2019, VWRA VS IWDA's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +1.02%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.7 years.
Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +12.2%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -11.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, VWRA VS IWDA closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +8.7%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -10.3%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.02% | 1.09% | -7.53% | 2.33% | -2.42% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 3.74% | -2.32% | -4.01% | 0.81% | 6.37% | 4.52% | 2.01% | 1.93% | 3.04% | 2.55% | 0.12% | 1.52% | 21.74% |
| 2024 | 1.13% | 3.34% | 3.56% | -2.92% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 1.28% | 1.75% | 2.37% | -1.59% | 4.00% | -1.95% | 18.38% |
| 2023 | 6.60% | -1.99% | 2.56% | 1.75% | -1.13% | 6.16% | 3.52% | -2.41% | -3.97% | -3.52% | 9.11% | 5.47% | 23.27% |
| 2022 | -5.68% | -1.66% | 3.07% | -7.37% | -1.69% | -8.42% | 6.89% | -3.08% | -8.19% | 4.83% | 5.33% | -2.20% | -18.11% |
| 2021 | -0.25% | 2.49% | 2.89% | 4.37% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 2.48% | -3.67% | 4.60% | -2.00% | 3.97% | 20.31% |
Benchmark Metrics
VWRA VS IWDA has an annualized alpha of 5.65%, beta of 0.52, and R² of 0.36 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 29, 2019.
- This portfolio participated in 93.49% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 92.59% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
- Beta of 0.52 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.36 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R² of 0.36 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 5.65%
- Beta
- 0.52
- R²
- 0.36
- Upside Capture
- 92.59%
- Downside Capture
- 93.49%
Expense Ratio
VWRA VS IWDA has an expense ratio of 0.21%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
VWRA VS IWDA ranks 63 for risk / return — better than 63% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 0.88 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.37 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 1.39 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 6.43 | +5.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 74 | 1.24 | 1.78 | 1.26 | 2.81 | 12.10 |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 77 | 1.35 | 1.89 | 1.28 | 2.79 | 11.97 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the VWRA VS IWDA. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the VWRA VS IWDA was 33.84%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 106 trading sessions.
The current VWRA VS IWDA drawdown is 5.81%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -33.84% | Feb 13, 2020 | 28 | Mar 23, 2020 | 106 | Aug 24, 2020 | 134 |
| -25.97% | Dec 31, 2021 | 196 | Oct 12, 2022 | 304 | Dec 27, 2023 | 500 |
| -16.59% | Feb 18, 2025 | 37 | Apr 9, 2025 | 35 | Jun 3, 2025 | 72 |
| -8.48% | Feb 26, 2026 | 22 | Mar 27, 2026 | — | — | — |
| -7.55% | Jul 16, 2024 | 15 | Aug 5, 2024 | 14 | Aug 23, 2024 | 29 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | VWRA.L | IWDA.L | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| VWRA.L | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 |
| IWDA.L | 0.60 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Portfolio | 0.60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |