PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
trashpile vs hedge
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


TSLA 25.00%PLTR 25.00%DDOG 25.00%RSPD 25.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in trashpile vs hedge, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 30, 2020, corresponding to the inception date of PLTR

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.72%-3.54%-3.95%-2.09%15.95%16.96%10.34%12.24%
Portfolio
trashpile vs hedge
0.91%-0.97%-12.66%-15.78%31.58%49.43%22.08%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
2.56%-5.47%-15.22%-17.02%42.02%22.49%11.57%37.45%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.14%0.91%-17.59%-20.79%72.99%158.81%44.73%
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
0.53%6.80%-12.74%-22.29%17.43%17.76%6.36%
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.40%-6.82%-5.55%-6.80%8.16%9.16%3.58%7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 1, 2020, trashpile vs hedge's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.97%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.

Historically, 51% of months were positive and 49% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +63.4%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -17.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, trashpile vs hedge closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +15.8%, while the worst single day was May 9, 2022 at -10.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-6.17%-6.06%-1.80%0.91%-12.66%
20252.93%-10.49%-8.02%12.46%13.75%2.57%5.34%2.55%12.86%5.67%-5.59%-1.48%33.23%
2024-7.66%19.04%-5.49%-1.45%-3.82%11.16%3.75%2.41%12.05%3.62%33.16%6.29%91.10%
202319.29%5.47%1.00%-8.80%36.72%10.56%13.37%-13.48%-2.07%-11.25%27.35%0.25%90.68%
2022-15.53%-3.06%6.65%-17.36%-13.35%-5.57%16.43%-8.50%-6.21%-1.30%-6.13%-13.38%-52.65%
202115.90%-13.08%-1.93%3.39%-1.73%9.82%-2.62%13.24%-0.95%19.00%-2.41%-3.70%34.66%

Benchmark Metrics

trashpile vs hedge has an annualized alpha of 12.28%, beta of 1.69, and R² of 0.50 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 01, 2020.

  • This portfolio captured 177.73% of S&P 500 Index gains and 107.70% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • R² of 0.50 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
12.28%
Beta
1.69
0.50
Upside Capture
177.73%
Downside Capture
107.70%

Expense Ratio

trashpile vs hedge has an expense ratio of 0.10%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

trashpile vs hedge ranks 25 for risk / return — below 25% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


trashpile vs hedge Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
trashpile vs hedge Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
trashpile vs hedge Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
trashpile vs hedge Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
trashpile vs hedge Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
trashpile vs hedge Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.92

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.41

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

6.61

-2.90


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
680.761.411.171.714.17
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
761.271.841.241.954.72
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
510.320.921.110.400.89
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
230.360.711.090.651.88

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

trashpile vs hedge Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.98
  • 5-Year: 0.56
  • All Time: 0.75

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of trashpile vs hedge compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

trashpile vs hedge provided a 0.26% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.26%0.27%0.21%0.27%0.25%0.13%0.20%0.40%0.42%0.36%0.32%0.34%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.04%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the trashpile vs hedge. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the trashpile vs hedge was 60.73%, occurring on Jan 5, 2023. Recovery took 428 trading sessions.

The current trashpile vs hedge drawdown is 22.30%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-60.73%Nov 8, 2021292Jan 5, 2023428Sep 19, 2024720
-33.15%Feb 19, 202535Apr 8, 202551Jun 23, 202586
-30.23%Feb 10, 202165May 13, 202192Sep 23, 2021157
-25.93%Nov 11, 202595Mar 30, 2026
-11.67%Dec 26, 202411Jan 13, 202515Feb 4, 202526

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkDDOGTSLARSPDPLTRPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.510.560.790.530.69
DDOG0.511.000.410.430.510.73
TSLA0.560.411.000.480.490.76
RSPD0.790.430.481.000.460.63
PLTR0.530.510.490.461.000.84
Portfolio0.690.730.760.630.841.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 1, 2020