PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Simple Stable
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


GLD 33.33%QQQ 33.33%SPMO 33.33%CommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Simple Stable, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Oct 12, 2015, corresponding to the inception date of SPMO

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the Simple Stable returned 0.11% Year-To-Date and 17.55% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Simple Stable
-0.53%-4.95%0.11%4.21%32.06%28.74%18.18%17.55%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-1.92%-8.27%8.35%21.03%49.02%32.51%21.53%13.97%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.11%-2.64%-4.65%-3.18%23.45%22.97%13.18%19.05%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.21%-3.49%-3.57%-4.50%22.96%28.37%17.71%17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 13, 2015, Simple Stable's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.38%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.2 years.

Historically, 69% of months were positive and 31% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +11.2%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -8.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Simple Stable closed higher 57% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +8.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -9.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.66%2.26%-7.54%1.16%0.11%
20254.76%-0.33%-1.53%3.02%6.73%4.68%1.55%2.18%7.09%2.96%0.86%0.40%37.11%
20242.01%5.87%4.61%-2.25%4.93%4.55%0.68%2.32%3.19%1.20%2.88%-0.86%32.93%
20235.31%-3.37%6.55%1.42%0.33%3.45%2.64%-0.15%-3.67%1.09%7.57%4.45%27.98%
2022-5.58%0.03%3.01%-8.04%-1.15%-6.11%5.94%-3.72%-6.93%5.24%5.62%-3.12%-15.11%
2021-0.93%-2.57%0.79%4.95%1.85%1.92%2.54%2.91%-4.52%5.54%-0.52%2.36%14.75%

Benchmark Metrics

Simple Stable has an annualized alpha of 8.18%, beta of 0.70, and R² of 0.74 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 13, 2015.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (88.10%) than losses (57.93%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 8.18% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
8.18%
Beta
0.70
0.74
Upside Capture
88.10%
Downside Capture
57.93%

Expense Ratio

Simple Stable has an expense ratio of 0.24%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Simple Stable ranks 79 for risk / return — better than 79% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


Simple Stable Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
Simple Stable Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Simple Stable Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
Simple Stable Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
Simple Stable Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
Simple Stable Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

0.88

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

1.37

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.39

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.55

6.43

+4.12


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
801.772.191.322.579.28
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
591.041.621.231.937.00
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
581.011.551.231.916.68

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Simple Stable Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.74
  • 5-Year: 1.21
  • 10-Year: 1.18
  • All Time: 1.17

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Simple Stable compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Simple Stable provided a 0.46% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.46%0.40%0.35%0.75%0.82%0.32%0.61%0.71%0.65%0.53%1.00%0.45%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.88%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Simple Stable. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Simple Stable was 22.12%, occurring on Sep 26, 2022. Recovery took 286 trading sessions.

The current Simple Stable drawdown is 8.61%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-22.12%Nov 19, 2021213Sep 26, 2022286Nov 14, 2023499
-21.79%Feb 20, 202018Mar 16, 202052May 29, 202070
-13.69%Feb 20, 202534Apr 8, 202523May 12, 202557
-13.24%Oct 3, 201857Dec 24, 201837Feb 19, 201994
-12.89%Jan 30, 202641Mar 30, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkGLDSPMOQQQPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.030.780.910.81
GLD0.031.000.060.030.42
SPMO0.780.061.000.760.83
QQQ0.910.030.761.000.84
Portfolio0.810.420.830.841.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 13, 2015