PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
50/50
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


GC=F 50.00%VWRD.L 50.00%CommodityCommodityEquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
GC=F
Gold
50%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
Global Equities
50%

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 50/50, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every week.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 28, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of VWRD.L

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the 50/50 returned 3.63% Year-To-Date and 13.54% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
50/50
-1.18%-5.01%3.63%12.06%35.80%25.64%16.29%13.54%
GC=F
Gold
-1.68%-7.92%8.72%22.48%49.77%33.33%22.19%14.46%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
-0.65%-2.32%-2.01%1.32%20.91%17.16%9.57%11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 29, 2012, 50/50's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.86%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.7 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +7.9%, while the worst month was Mar 2026 at -9.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, 50/50 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +7.4%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -6.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20266.02%5.97%-9.31%1.71%3.63%
20255.32%-0.68%3.08%3.35%2.96%2.40%0.95%3.75%6.87%3.28%1.41%3.64%42.76%
20240.11%1.65%5.90%0.30%1.99%1.89%2.74%2.30%4.16%1.00%0.37%-1.45%22.86%
20236.37%-3.71%5.16%1.30%-1.20%1.88%3.15%-2.07%-4.29%1.83%5.89%3.23%18.17%
2022-3.73%2.32%2.70%-4.75%-2.32%-5.17%1.95%-2.82%-5.65%1.39%6.23%1.07%-9.17%
2021-1.20%-2.23%1.04%3.62%4.69%-3.04%1.59%1.25%-3.39%2.94%-1.33%3.50%7.25%

Benchmark Metrics

50/50 has an annualized alpha of 6.68%, beta of 0.28, and R² of 0.16 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 29, 2012.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (53.13%) than losses (42.63%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • Beta of 0.28 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.16 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.16 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
6.68%
Beta
0.28
0.16
Upside Capture
53.13%
Downside Capture
42.63%

Expense Ratio

50/50 has an expense ratio of 0.11%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

50/50 ranks 86 for risk / return — in the top 86% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


50/50 Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
50/50 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
50/50 Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
50/50 Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
50/50 Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
50/50 Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

0.88

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

1.37

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.39

+1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.38

6.43

+6.95


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GC=F
Gold
821.722.131.322.649.67
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
771.351.891.282.8012.07

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

50/50 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.03
  • 5-Year: 1.26
  • 10-Year: 1.12
  • All Time: 0.87

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 50/50 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

50/50 provided a 0.71% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.71%0.69%0.76%0.85%1.03%0.74%0.73%0.94%1.15%0.91%1.02%1.03%
GC=F
Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.41%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 50/50. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 50/50 was 20.51%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 57 trading sessions.

The current 50/50 drawdown is 7.90%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-20.51%Feb 24, 202018Mar 18, 202057Jun 9, 202075
-18.51%Apr 1, 2022127Sep 27, 2022202Jul 12, 2023329
-15.55%Jul 3, 2014399Jan 20, 2016115Jul 1, 2016514
-14.47%Jan 31, 2013105Jun 27, 2013260Jul 2, 2014365
-12.38%Jan 26, 2018235Dec 24, 2018124Jun 20, 2019359

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkGC=FVWRD.LPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.000.570.36
GC=F0.001.000.080.73
VWRD.L0.570.081.000.67
Portfolio0.360.730.671.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 29, 2012