PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
oposite correlation optimized
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


TSLA 25.00%XLE 25.00%XBI 25.00%F 25.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in oposite correlation optimized, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jun 29, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of TSLA

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the oposite correlation optimized returned 2.90% Year-To-Date and 21.22% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
oposite correlation optimized
-1.38%-0.31%2.90%11.50%38.97%20.06%15.20%21.22%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-5.42%-8.11%-19.82%-17.30%27.53%22.79%10.33%36.16%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.47%5.52%33.39%36.01%29.93%14.70%23.16%11.36%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.32%4.42%5.77%26.12%60.61%18.94%-1.10%9.28%
F
Ford Motor Company
-0.68%-8.66%-10.63%-2.94%20.16%3.38%3.85%3.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 30, 2010, oposite correlation optimized's average daily return is +0.10%, while the average monthly return is +1.98%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.9 years.

Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was May 2013 with a return of +30.8%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -24.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, oposite correlation optimized closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +15.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -14.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.50%2.31%-2.62%-1.16%2.90%
20251.82%-7.24%-2.31%-0.83%6.68%0.69%1.32%6.11%11.21%5.91%2.28%0.42%27.82%
2024-7.73%8.14%0.66%-4.06%0.65%4.34%3.07%-1.06%3.11%-1.98%14.40%-1.65%17.35%
202316.70%0.18%-0.88%-4.52%4.04%14.85%-0.13%-3.79%-1.48%-13.82%9.34%10.14%29.87%
2022-2.64%-3.71%7.50%-13.61%-0.91%-10.65%20.75%0.62%-11.84%8.38%-0.68%-11.97%-21.75%
202111.17%3.60%0.65%0.55%2.42%5.11%-5.56%1.61%4.25%18.45%1.52%-0.20%50.65%

Benchmark Metrics

oposite correlation optimized has an annualized alpha of 8.53%, beta of 1.22, and R² of 0.57 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 30, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 144.50% of S&P 500 Index gains and 101.23% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 8.53% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
8.53%
Beta
1.22
0.57
Upside Capture
144.50%
Downside Capture
101.23%

Expense Ratio

oposite correlation optimized has an expense ratio of 0.11%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

oposite correlation optimized ranks 71 for risk / return — better than 71% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


oposite correlation optimized Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
oposite correlation optimized Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
oposite correlation optimized Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
oposite correlation optimized Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
oposite correlation optimized Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
oposite correlation optimized Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

0.88

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.37

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.39

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.37

6.43

+5.94


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
600.501.101.131.253.01
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
541.191.581.231.604.21
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
922.132.831.364.9017.98
F
Ford Motor Company
600.621.131.141.023.34

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

oposite correlation optimized Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.50
  • 5-Year: 0.55
  • 10-Year: 0.74
  • All Time: 0.82

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of oposite correlation optimized compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

oposite correlation optimized provided a 2.01% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.01%2.34%2.85%2.12%2.00%1.18%1.88%3.29%3.34%2.12%2.38%2.06%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.52%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.34%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%
F
Ford Motor Company
5.17%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the oposite correlation optimized. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the oposite correlation optimized was 51.13%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 79 trading sessions.

The current oposite correlation optimized drawdown is 4.71%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-51.13%Feb 20, 202020Mar 18, 202079Jul 10, 202099
-35.44%Jun 24, 2015160Feb 10, 2016337Jun 13, 2017497
-30.93%Jan 5, 2022247Dec 28, 2022379Jul 3, 2024626
-27.92%Jun 21, 2018129Dec 24, 2018249Dec 19, 2019378
-27.41%Jun 1, 201187Oct 3, 201194Feb 16, 2012181

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkTSLAXLEXBIFPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.460.570.590.580.71
TSLA0.461.000.220.380.310.78
XLE0.570.221.000.340.470.56
XBI0.590.380.341.000.370.68
F0.580.310.470.371.000.67
Portfolio0.710.780.560.680.671.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jun 30, 2010