PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Lilly 1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Lilly 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 5, 2018, corresponding to the inception date of QTUM

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Lilly 1
0.35%-3.61%-3.20%-4.31%34.61%29.59%20.34%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
1.11%-7.54%-22.60%-27.29%-1.52%10.00%9.94%22.58%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.93%-1.47%-4.88%-6.08%60.69%85.17%66.71%70.07%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.61%-1.94%0.48%1.40%47.52%34.57%18.98%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
-0.51%-6.96%7.62%-3.45%83.53%37.36%23.42%13.89%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.11%-3.33%-3.55%-1.41%17.60%18.47%11.96%14.19%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.85%-1.42%-5.36%-5.79%29.79%23.50%15.02%21.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 6, 2018, Lilly 1's average daily return is +0.09%, while the average monthly return is +1.73%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 3.4 years.

Historically, 70% of months were positive and 30% were negative. The best month was May 2025 with a return of +12.7%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -10.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Lilly 1 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +11.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.9%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.53%-1.86%-5.96%1.31%-3.20%
20251.67%-3.37%-6.96%1.53%12.70%9.09%3.58%1.33%6.99%6.07%-5.49%0.32%28.84%
20244.31%6.49%4.24%-4.09%8.89%3.29%-1.07%0.76%3.11%1.07%6.65%-1.00%36.99%
20239.48%0.39%7.24%0.50%5.80%6.84%3.66%-0.57%-3.30%-2.20%10.44%4.32%50.37%
2022-7.03%-1.91%3.96%-10.62%0.63%-9.42%10.25%-5.20%-10.81%6.24%8.72%-6.46%-22.20%
20210.60%2.28%3.40%5.07%0.99%4.84%1.41%4.43%-4.39%8.86%2.72%1.94%36.61%

Benchmark Metrics

Lilly 1 has an annualized alpha of 7.68%, beta of 1.11, and R² of 0.91 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 06, 2018.

  • This portfolio captured 128.84% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 93.49% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 7.68% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.11 and R² of 0.91, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
7.68%
Beta
1.11
0.91
Upside Capture
128.84%
Downside Capture
93.49%

Expense Ratio

Lilly 1 has an expense ratio of 0.17%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Lilly 1 ranks 63 for risk / return — better than 63% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


Lilly 1 Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
Lilly 1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Lilly 1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
Lilly 1 Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
Lilly 1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
Lilly 1 Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

0.88

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

1.37

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.39

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.72

6.43

+1.28


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
35-0.060.111.01-0.05-0.12
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
811.472.171.273.027.54
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
821.612.241.303.1811.03
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
821.992.571.323.307.88
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
540.981.491.231.537.13
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
581.101.671.231.885.72

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Lilly 1 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.47
  • 5-Year: 0.96
  • All Time: 0.91

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Lilly 1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Lilly 1 provided a 1.12% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.12%1.09%0.85%1.52%1.41%1.01%1.21%1.45%1.79%1.74%1.76%1.79%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.93%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
1.07%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
2.37%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.43%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Lilly 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Lilly 1 was 32.97%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 76 trading sessions.

The current Lilly 1 drawdown is 10.09%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-32.97%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202076Jul 10, 202099
-30.43%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022164Jun 12, 2023366
-23.87%Jan 24, 202552Apr 8, 202541Jun 6, 202593
-21.46%Oct 2, 201858Dec 24, 201881Apr 23, 2019139
-14.59%Jan 29, 202642Mar 30, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.21, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkNLRNVDAMSFTQTUMVOOVGTPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.590.680.750.831.000.910.94
NLR0.591.000.380.390.540.590.500.66
NVDA0.680.381.000.630.710.670.800.81
MSFT0.750.390.631.000.640.750.830.79
QTUM0.830.540.710.641.000.830.860.90
VOO1.000.590.670.750.831.000.910.93
VGT0.910.500.800.830.860.911.000.95
Portfolio0.940.660.810.790.900.930.951.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 6, 2018