PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
(no name)
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


PLTM 50.00%PPLT 50.00%CommodityCommodity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in (no name), comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 5, 2018, corresponding to the inception date of PLTM

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
(no name)
1.45%-5.24%-2.98%26.57%104.01%25.38%9.84%
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
1.59%-5.20%-2.94%26.57%104.38%25.41%9.93%
PPLT
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
1.32%-5.29%-3.03%26.57%103.64%25.36%9.75%7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 6, 2018, (no name)'s average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.91%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.4 years.

Historically, 54% of months were positive and 46% were negative. The best month was Jun 2025 with a return of +27.2%, while the worst month was Mar 2026 at -16.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, (no name) closed higher 50% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +10.4%, while the worst single day was Jan 30, 2026 at -18.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.41%10.37%-16.94%1.35%-2.98%
20258.04%-3.71%5.81%-3.23%9.21%27.16%-4.10%6.31%14.03%0.46%6.48%22.02%124.47%
2024-7.49%-4.04%3.22%3.05%10.50%-3.91%-1.99%-5.07%5.60%1.27%-4.30%-4.58%-8.90%
2023-5.72%-5.88%4.17%8.18%-7.22%-9.22%5.05%1.81%-6.65%3.06%-0.50%6.53%-8.14%
20225.92%2.11%-5.60%-5.13%3.17%-7.38%-0.08%-5.52%1.85%7.46%11.46%3.78%10.63%
20210.24%10.05%0.25%0.80%-1.64%-9.12%-2.23%-3.49%-4.65%5.16%-8.26%3.32%-10.64%

Benchmark Metrics

Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 6.87%, beta of 0.47, and R² of 0.09 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 06, 2018.

  • This portfolio participated in 50.14% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 49.16% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.47 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.09 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.09 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
6.87%
Beta
0.47
0.09
Upside Capture
49.16%
Downside Capture
50.14%

Expense Ratio

(no name) has an expense ratio of 0.55%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

(no name) ranks 74 for risk / return — better than 74% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


(no name) Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
(no name) Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
(no name) Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
(no name) Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
(no name) Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
(no name) Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

0.88

+1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

1.37

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.39

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.67

6.43

+2.24


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
832.112.311.362.928.65
PPLT
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
842.122.331.362.938.69

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

(no name) Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.12
  • 5-Year: 0.31
  • All Time: 0.27

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of (no name) compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield


(no name) doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the (no name). A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the (no name) was 42.41%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. Recovery took 180 trading sessions.

The current (no name) drawdown is 29.34%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-42.41%Jan 21, 202042Mar 19, 2020180Dec 3, 2020222
-35.77%Feb 22, 2021387Sep 1, 2022700Jun 18, 20251087
-34.46%Jan 26, 202643Mar 26, 2026
-23.79%Feb 20, 2018124Aug 15, 2018356Jan 15, 2020480
-15.35%Dec 29, 20253Dec 31, 20253Jan 6, 20266

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkPLTMPPLTPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.260.280.27
PLTM0.261.000.970.99
PPLT0.280.971.000.99
Portfolio0.270.990.991.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Feb 6, 2018