PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
test1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


USD=X 50.00%FTEC 40.00%XME 10.00%CurrencyCurrencyEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Oct 24, 2013, corresponding to the inception date of FTEC

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the test1 returned -1.26% Year-To-Date and 11.27% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-2.33%-3.84%-1.98%29.73%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
test1
0.00%-0.05%-1.26%-0.61%29.14%13.00%9.02%11.27%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.86%-0.72%-5.31%-5.33%49.87%23.87%15.25%21.45%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.80%0.64%6.99%13.76%129.50%28.33%23.51%20.17%
USD=X
USD Cash
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 25, 2013, test1's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.80%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 7.2 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +7.6%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -6.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, test1 closed higher 39% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +6.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -5.9%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.15%-1.06%-2.44%1.14%-1.26%
20250.15%-1.40%-3.94%0.59%4.86%5.17%2.65%1.64%4.51%2.94%-2.08%0.83%16.61%
20240.42%1.84%1.26%-2.43%3.95%2.48%0.11%-0.26%1.67%-0.37%3.64%-1.81%10.79%
20235.35%0.00%3.44%-0.83%2.54%3.77%1.76%-1.23%-2.45%-1.08%6.29%2.99%22.10%
2022-3.82%0.92%3.17%-5.50%-1.05%-5.35%6.43%-2.19%-6.24%4.35%3.38%-4.11%-10.51%
2021-0.61%1.65%1.50%2.22%0.97%2.17%1.79%1.26%-2.93%3.69%0.74%1.95%15.21%

Benchmark Metrics

test1 has an annualized alpha of 2.56%, beta of 0.60, and R² of 0.86 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 25, 2013.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (63.56%) than losses (59.31%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.56% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.60 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index — a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
2.56%
Beta
0.60
0.86
Upside Capture
63.56%
Downside Capture
59.31%

Expense Ratio

test1 has an expense ratio of 0.07%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

test1 ranks 64 for risk / return — better than 64% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


test1 Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
test1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
test1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
test1 Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
test1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
test1 Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

0.88

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.59

1.37

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.21

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.39

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.45

6.43

-2.98


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
581.101.691.241.925.88
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
932.723.141.434.3812.38
USD=X
USD Cash

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

test1 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.34
  • 5-Year: 0.75
  • 10-Year: 0.96
  • All Time: 0.86

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of test1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

test1 provided a 0.21% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.21%0.21%0.26%0.41%0.53%0.32%0.43%0.66%0.70%0.50%0.60%0.77%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.45%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.35%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%
USD=X
USD Cash
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the test1 was 17.65%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 74 trading sessions.

The current test1 drawdown is 4.66%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-17.65%Feb 20, 202033Mar 23, 202074Jun 5, 2020107
-14.91%Mar 30, 2022199Oct 14, 2022241Jun 12, 2023440
-14.08%Dec 5, 2024125Apr 8, 202577Jun 24, 2025202
-12.31%Aug 30, 2018117Dec 24, 201887Mar 21, 2019204
-11.32%May 15, 2015251Jan 20, 2016138Jun 6, 2016389

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.38, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkUSD=XXMEFTECPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.000.570.890.90
USD=X0.000.000.000.000.00
XME0.570.001.000.440.66
FTEC0.890.000.441.000.92
Portfolio0.900.000.660.921.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 25, 2013