PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
gpt2
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


EGLN.L 20.00%NVDA 22.00%ASML 15.00%MSFT 13.00%PLTR 10.00%MELI 10.00%BRK-B 10.00%CommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of €10,000 in gpt2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 30, 2020, corresponding to the inception date of PLTR

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.56%-2.80%-2.10%-0.42%8.95%14.67%10.82%12.14%
Portfolio
gpt2
-0.03%-3.09%-0.59%-0.11%32.91%48.15%34.40%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.00%-2.01%-4.31%-5.72%49.03%80.98%66.99%69.65%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
-2.69%-2.58%25.52%30.29%86.87%23.95%17.31%30.37%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
1.80%1.50%-14.97%-19.37%59.34%155.80%45.71%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.00%-8.21%-22.27%-27.14%-8.83%7.45%10.09%22.25%
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
0.25%0.74%-13.29%-22.43%-16.75%7.26%3.00%30.53%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%-0.21%-3.34%-2.25%-16.70%13.26%13.54%12.65%
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-1.76%-8.41%10.25%23.44%40.37%30.18%22.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 1, 2020, gpt2's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.92%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +23.9%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -11.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, gpt2 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +11.1%, while the worst single day was May 9, 2022 at -7.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.72%-2.61%-3.30%0.80%-0.59%
20252.55%2.25%-6.71%3.18%10.18%2.58%5.46%-0.89%9.10%6.06%-4.62%0.39%32.12%
202411.45%14.06%4.97%-2.99%8.88%7.07%-1.90%3.65%1.70%2.60%11.69%1.48%81.47%
202316.52%5.91%9.15%-2.10%22.46%1.53%5.34%-0.52%-3.77%0.04%10.97%-0.38%82.88%
2022-9.66%-0.32%7.64%-11.92%-5.74%-8.22%16.11%-8.62%-6.54%5.83%7.07%-10.27%-25.53%
20217.40%-3.22%3.40%3.86%1.57%10.99%0.71%9.58%-5.17%9.29%4.76%-2.01%47.76%

Benchmark Metrics

gpt2 has an annualized alpha of 20.32%, beta of 1.22, and R² of 0.62 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 01, 2020.

  • This portfolio captured 214.18% of S&P 500 Index gains and 106.57% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 20.32% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
20.32%
Beta
1.22
0.62
Upside Capture
214.18%
Downside Capture
106.57%

Expense Ratio

gpt2 has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

gpt2 ranks 61 for risk / return — better than 61% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


gpt2 Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
gpt2 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
gpt2 Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
gpt2 Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
gpt2 Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
gpt2 Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

0.43

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

0.73

+1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.12

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

0.65

+2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.07

2.68

+6.38


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
751.131.761.232.485.42
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
892.032.621.345.3413.27
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
701.021.601.211.623.91
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
26-0.32-0.270.96-0.27-0.69
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
23-0.42-0.360.95-0.40-0.82
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
11-0.85-1.070.86-0.79-1.12
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
801.652.131.322.639.85

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

gpt2 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.33
  • 5-Year: 1.32
  • All Time: 1.44

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of gpt2 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

gpt2 provided a 0.23% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.23%0.24%0.25%0.23%0.35%0.18%0.22%0.43%0.46%0.42%0.58%0.71%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.71%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.93%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.19%0.38%0.36%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the gpt2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the gpt2 was 34.36%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 151 trading sessions.

The current gpt2 drawdown is 7.68%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-34.36%Nov 22, 2021234Oct 14, 2022151May 18, 2023385
-20.98%Feb 19, 202533Apr 4, 202529May 16, 202562
-14.25%Feb 12, 202117Mar 8, 202127Apr 15, 202144
-13.57%Jul 11, 202418Aug 5, 202444Oct 4, 202462
-11.41%Jan 29, 202643Mar 30, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 7 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.34, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkEGLN.LBRK-BPLTRMELIASMLMSFTNVDAPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.010.560.500.520.620.740.650.76
EGLN.L0.011.00-0.020.00-0.020.00-0.00-0.030.09
BRK-B0.56-0.021.000.130.200.180.290.160.26
PLTR0.500.000.131.000.430.400.420.480.70
MELI0.52-0.020.200.431.000.440.430.460.63
ASML0.620.000.180.400.441.000.520.640.75
MSFT0.74-0.000.290.420.430.521.000.600.70
NVDA0.65-0.030.160.480.460.640.601.000.87
Portfolio0.760.090.260.700.630.750.700.871.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 1, 2020