Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | Nasdaq-100 | 50% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | Large Cap Growth Equities | 25% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | Semiconductors, Technology Equities | 5% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 5% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | Technology Equities | 5% |
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | Financial Services | 3% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | Technology | 3% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 2.50% |
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | Financial Services | 1.50% |
Find the right asset allocation for 2025
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2025, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | 0.31% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 24.33% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio 2025 | 0.46% | -2.58% | 13.72% | 13.36% | 24.45% | 37.56% | 22.57% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 1.92% | 25.71% | 62.85% | 17.46% | 77.20% | 61.95% | -2.03% | -6.12% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -0.94% | -3.68% | 6.79% | 4.25% | 19.09% | 29.80% | 19.76% | — |
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 3.45% | 13.18% | 56.79% | 22.22% | -6.38% | 13.30% | -11.91% | -10.09% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | 3.18% | -30.13% | -18.41% | -29.74% | -67.62% | 63.46% | 19.14% | 20.92% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.16% | -8.83% | 10.16% | 17.38% | 44.72% | 71.13% | 63.13% | 67.95% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.59% | 0.22% | 17.57% | 17.85% | 37.55% | 26.43% | 16.85% | 21.79% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 1.22% | 9.07% | 47.39% | 45.72% | 86.28% | 48.15% | 28.09% | — |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 1.59% | 12.49% | 98.11% | 99.51% | 171.57% | 53.00% | 33.69% | 35.55% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 1.82% | -3.74% | -9.63% | -11.45% | 24.94% | 16.25% | 14.86% | 39.72% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Nov 13, 2019, 2025's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.90%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.
Historically, 58% of months were positive and 43% were negative. The best month was Oct 2021 with a return of +22.7%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -21.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 5 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, 2025 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +16.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.2%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.85% | -5.28% | -4.21% | 17.48% | 10.64% | -4.39% | 13.72% | ||||||
| 2025 | 0.65% | -7.54% | -8.18% | 7.01% | 12.16% | 9.48% | 4.11% | -2.08% | 7.53% | 3.92% | -8.98% | -1.02% | 15.23% |
| 2024 | -0.12% | 17.51% | 5.80% | -8.35% | 13.25% | 7.39% | -0.61% | -2.32% | 4.45% | 5.51% | 15.07% | -3.76% | 64.00% |
| 2023 | 21.58% | 4.53% | 10.86% | -1.52% | 14.28% | 11.32% | 6.79% | -3.50% | -7.93% | -3.72% | 14.54% | 11.48% | 105.88% |
| 2022 | -13.27% | -2.47% | 8.36% | -21.81% | -6.11% | -13.25% | 21.01% | -6.81% | -10.43% | 0.92% | 0.21% | -14.48% | -49.00% |
| 2021 | 9.70% | 5.58% | 7.23% | -1.42% | -8.85% | 11.97% | -2.00% | 10.51% | -7.91% | 22.72% | 2.67% | -10.13% | 41.09% |
Benchmark Metrics
2025 has an annualized alpha of 15.01%, beta of 1.42, and R2 of 0.64 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since November 13, 2019.
- This portfolio captured 196.73% of S&P 500 Index gains and 117.88% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 15.01% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 15.01%
- Beta
- 1.42
- R²
- 0.64
- Upside Capture
- 196.73%
- Downside Capture
- 117.88%
Expense Ratio
2025 has an expense ratio of 0.27%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
2025 ranks 12 for risk / return — in the bottom 12% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2025 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.86 | -0.94 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 2.53 | -1.19 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.53 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.65 | 11.37 | -8.72 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 66 | 0.79 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 1.80 |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 22 | 0.79 | 1.19 | 1.15 | 0.75 | 2.12 |
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 38 | -0.14 | 0.37 | 1.04 | -0.16 | -0.26 |
MSTR Strategy Inc | 8 | -0.95 | -1.71 | 0.82 | -0.88 | -1.27 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 74 | 1.20 | 1.75 | 1.21 | 2.07 | 4.94 |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 69 | 2.09 | 2.73 | 1.37 | 3.01 | 11.22 |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 90 | 2.94 | 3.45 | 1.46 | 5.46 | 19.77 |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 96 | 4.43 | 4.37 | 1.62 | 10.50 | 38.20 |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 61 | 0.62 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.92 | 2.10 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
2025 provided a 0.25% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.27% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.61% | 0.62% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2025. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 2025 was 60.02%, occurring on Dec 28, 2022. Recovery took 290 trading sessions.
The current 2025 drawdown is 6.19%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bear market2022 | -60.02%Dec 2022 | 1y 1mo | 1y 2mo | 2y 3moNov 2021 - Feb 2024 |
COVID crash2020 | -32.43%Mar 2020 | 27d | 2mo 19d | 3mo 16dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020 |
2025 selloff2025 | -31.43%Apr 2025 | 3mo 22d | 2mo 19d | 6mo 11dDec 2024 - Jun 2025 |
2021 bear market2021 | -24.40%May 2021 | 2mo 24d | 3mo 20d | 6mo 14dFeb 2021 - Aug 2021 |
2026 bear market2026 | -22.40%Mar 2026 | 5mo 1d | 1mo 7d | 6mo 8dOct 2025 - May 2026 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 9 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.10, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your portfolio is dominated by one or two holdings, which significantly increases concentration risk. Consider rebalancing toward more even weights or adding additional positions.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.19 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.20, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
2025 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.79 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. QQQ has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.92, while CLSK has the lowest at 0.42.
Asset Correlations Table
| CLSK | TSLA | MARA | MSTR | NVDA | SOXX | FNGS | QTUM | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| TSLA | 0.39 | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.61 |
| MARA | 0.64 | 0.39 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.48 |
| MSTR | 0.60 | 0.42 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.50 |
| NVDA | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.78 |
| SOXX | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
| FNGS | 0.42 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.90 |
| QTUM | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| QQQ | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
Find what 2025 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 2025 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification