PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4F2S
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 4F2S, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 2, 2014, corresponding to the inception date of ARES

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the 4F2S returned -6.52% Year-To-Date and 28.07% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
4F2S
-1.62%-3.37%-6.52%1.28%29.82%34.06%21.86%28.07%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
0.33%0.05%-1.30%11.87%56.44%41.69%24.33%20.98%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-0.26%-1.89%-8.16%-3.31%22.30%34.44%16.83%20.51%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-3.19%-7.83%-35.76%-30.28%-31.14%10.98%15.80%26.24%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
-2.91%-0.04%-25.75%-15.19%-23.21%21.72%19.90%25.10%
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
-0.72%-3.72%11.88%18.31%101.39%56.27%24.16%32.63%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
-3.13%-3.21%23.29%28.26%99.10%26.32%16.83%30.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 5, 2014, 4F2S's average daily return is +0.10%, while the average monthly return is +1.99%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.9 years.

Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was Nov 2022 with a return of +18.5%, while the worst month was Jun 2022 at -14.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, 4F2S closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +13.4%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.89%-5.76%-4.22%-1.26%-6.52%
20258.69%-7.73%-9.25%1.01%8.19%11.41%1.32%-0.46%8.00%0.39%2.14%4.78%29.69%
20246.02%8.97%4.04%-2.34%7.69%3.06%4.41%-0.87%-0.07%3.89%9.92%-1.49%51.58%
202314.83%-2.80%-0.45%0.27%4.41%6.10%4.36%-2.64%-2.29%-4.36%14.26%8.06%44.69%
2022-5.18%-4.65%-2.07%-14.00%7.93%-14.90%14.75%-3.28%-14.22%14.00%18.45%-8.99%-18.18%
20212.59%10.85%2.33%3.78%4.75%4.46%2.01%6.32%-4.15%10.73%-4.34%1.28%47.36%

Benchmark Metrics

4F2S has an annualized alpha of 10.24%, beta of 1.23, and R² of 0.75 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 05, 2014.

  • This portfolio captured 165.96% of S&P 500 Index gains and 108.94% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 10.24% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
10.24%
Beta
1.23
0.75
Upside Capture
165.96%
Downside Capture
108.94%

Expense Ratio

4F2S has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

4F2S ranks 42 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


4F2S Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
4F2S Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4F2S Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
4F2S Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
4F2S Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
4F2S Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.88

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.39

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.85

6.43

-0.59


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
851.772.301.333.129.83
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
670.891.281.181.514.05
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
14-0.68-0.750.90-0.59-1.46
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
16-0.54-0.530.93-0.61-1.42
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
932.643.231.415.7018.99
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
922.372.971.385.5815.42

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

4F2S Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.99
  • 5-Year: 0.83
  • 10-Year: 1.08
  • All Time: 0.97

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 4F2S compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

4F2S provided a 2.13% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.13%1.66%1.55%2.02%2.57%1.89%2.48%2.81%4.06%2.86%2.92%4.49%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.80%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.97%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
5.42%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
1.91%1.38%1.10%1.81%2.51%2.90%4.72%4.23%7.86%5.53%6.46%12.91%
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
0.98%1.00%1.18%1.78%2.49%1.57%1.56%3.46%3.64%2.32%2.61%2.54%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.71%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 4F2S. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 4F2S was 37.89%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 78 trading sessions.

The current 4F2S drawdown is 12.45%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-37.89%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 202078Jul 14, 2020105
-37.77%Nov 9, 2021232Oct 11, 2022190Jul 17, 2023422
-29.19%Jan 24, 202550Apr 4, 202557Jun 27, 2025107
-28.85%Jun 24, 2015161Feb 11, 2016139Aug 30, 2016300
-27.73%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 2018129Jul 1, 2019358

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkARESTSMAPOASMLJPMGSPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.500.590.580.660.640.670.81
ARES0.501.000.320.510.360.370.420.67
TSM0.590.321.000.380.640.340.410.71
APO0.580.510.381.000.410.480.520.73
ASML0.660.360.640.411.000.370.430.74
JPM0.640.370.340.480.371.000.790.69
GS0.670.420.410.520.430.791.000.75
Portfolio0.810.670.710.730.740.690.751.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 5, 2014