PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
对比组合2
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 对比组合2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 21, 2006, corresponding to the inception date of KXI

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the 对比组合2 returned -1.50% Year-To-Date and 10.02% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
对比组合2
-0.33%-4.39%-1.50%3.42%13.26%9.42%7.06%10.02%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
-0.43%-4.85%-3.38%3.39%6.11%5.28%5.46%8.35%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
-0.03%-2.65%-3.21%-2.28%33.70%24.09%15.00%20.84%
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
0.36%-5.36%4.10%6.45%7.32%5.25%5.44%5.77%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
-1.12%-3.13%3.44%6.16%32.02%15.51%3.38%7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 22, 2006, 对比组合2's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.79%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 7.3 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +10.3%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -13.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, 对比组合2 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +12.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -10.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.75%3.57%-8.04%0.65%-1.50%
20254.06%1.79%-2.34%-0.63%-0.18%2.88%-1.84%3.92%2.34%2.93%4.54%-0.18%18.38%
20241.41%2.70%2.33%-3.59%3.67%2.29%2.08%4.40%-0.94%-4.30%0.12%-4.41%5.34%
20232.40%-3.95%4.83%2.61%-2.24%3.60%1.80%-2.06%-4.00%-2.83%6.86%3.99%10.76%
2022-5.68%-1.88%3.02%-5.02%0.17%-4.52%4.35%-5.38%-6.64%7.07%7.44%-2.79%-10.73%
2021-0.06%-1.81%3.07%3.25%2.10%2.45%2.17%2.38%-4.96%4.12%-2.29%6.55%17.72%

Benchmark Metrics

对比组合2 has an annualized alpha of 1.93%, beta of 0.80, and R² of 0.86 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 22, 2006.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (85.72%) than losses (83.34%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.

Alpha
1.93%
Beta
0.80
0.86
Upside Capture
85.72%
Downside Capture
83.34%

Expense Ratio

对比组合2 has an expense ratio of 0.49%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

对比组合2 ranks 22 for risk / return — below 22% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


对比组合2 Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
对比组合2 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
对比组合2 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
对比组合2 Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
对比组合2 Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
对比组合2 Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.88

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

6.43

-1.42


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
210.360.611.080.631.70
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
691.251.861.262.417.90
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
250.560.881.110.712.01
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
771.592.161.322.388.92

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

对比组合2 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.88
  • 5-Year: 0.53
  • 10-Year: 0.66
  • All Time: 0.53

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.01 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 对比组合2 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

对比组合2 provided a 1.57% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.57%1.56%1.58%1.62%1.37%1.30%1.35%1.61%2.08%1.53%1.73%2.46%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
1.45%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
1.08%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
2.20%2.29%2.51%2.99%1.98%2.26%2.34%2.17%2.97%2.17%2.34%2.20%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.15%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 对比组合2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 对比组合2 was 44.27%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 531 trading sessions.

The current 对比组合2 drawdown is 7.14%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-44.27%Dec 7, 2007314Mar 9, 2009531Apr 14, 2011845
-27.81%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 202078Jul 14, 2020105
-20.35%Dec 30, 2021190Sep 30, 2022320Jan 10, 2024510
-16.16%Jul 21, 2015143Feb 11, 2016258Feb 21, 2017401
-15.48%Jun 1, 201150Aug 10, 2011131Feb 16, 2012181

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.41, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkKXIEEMIXNIXJPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.700.750.880.760.88
KXI0.701.000.600.560.710.79
EEM0.750.601.000.730.580.76
IXN0.880.560.731.000.620.79
IXJ0.760.710.580.621.000.95
Portfolio0.880.790.760.790.951.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 22, 2006