PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Multi-Factor Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Multi-Factor Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Multi-Factor Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jul 13, 2026, the Multi-Factor Portfolio returned 19.84% Year-To-Date and 14.64% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1M6MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.42%1.94%8.74%10.66%21.02%19.50%11.63%13.41%
Portfolio
Multi-Factor Portfolio
0.31%0.67%16.53%19.84%29.44%23.61%12.54%14.64%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.18%-0.70%25.46%28.81%37.17%32.02%14.53%16.62%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.54%1.46%8.08%11.04%20.62%18.98%11.49%14.22%
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
0.26%1.74%7.97%11.71%16.81%14.57%8.19%11.71%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
0.16%2.10%4.05%4.58%7.03%11.50%7.18%9.61%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
0.14%-1.17%36.52%44.01%73.07%30.29%16.36%14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 18, 2013, Multi-Factor Portfolio's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.19%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.9 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +11.8%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -12.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Multi-Factor Portfolio closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +10.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.55%0.82%-5.46%11.76%7.63%4.14%-2.13%19.84%
20254.28%-0.19%-5.31%0.30%6.24%3.71%0.35%2.29%3.77%0.23%0.34%0.56%17.33%
20242.78%6.70%3.35%-5.05%4.69%2.89%0.70%3.20%1.84%-0.97%6.12%-4.59%23.02%
20233.95%-3.43%2.08%1.41%-2.36%6.57%2.86%-0.73%-4.53%-1.98%8.72%5.09%18.05%
2022-6.98%-3.00%3.91%-9.19%0.20%-7.83%7.01%-3.48%-8.23%10.25%5.69%-4.86%-17.38%
2021-0.48%2.10%3.04%5.21%0.52%2.00%1.92%2.94%-4.76%7.09%-2.17%2.97%21.75%

Benchmark Metrics

Multi-Factor Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 2.05%, beta of 0.97, and R2 of 0.96 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 18, 2013.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (99.31%) than losses (89.44%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.05% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 0.97 and R2 of 0.96, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
2.05%
Beta
0.97
0.96
Upside Capture
99.31%
Downside Capture
89.44%

Expense Ratio

Multi-Factor Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.15%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Multi-Factor Portfolio ranks 71 for risk / return — better than 71% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


Multi-Factor Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
Multi-Factor Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Multi-Factor Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
Multi-Factor Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
Multi-Factor Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
Multi-Factor Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Factor Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.65

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.66

2.28

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.28

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

9.88

+4.71


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
64
1.552.061.293.1711.07
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
62
1.652.361.292.219.96
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
46
1.211.811.211.987.65
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
25
0.731.081.130.973.16
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
96
3.644.691.627.9730.69

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Multi-Factor Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 1.94 as of Jul 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.37 to 2.14, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Multi-Factor Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Multi-Factor Portfolio provided a 0.93% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.93%1.16%1.21%1.49%1.83%1.08%1.34%1.66%1.87%1.52%1.80%1.60%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.58%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.86%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
1.36%1.50%1.53%1.42%1.59%1.19%1.43%1.35%2.43%1.58%1.88%1.95%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.48%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.43%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Multi-Factor Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Multi-Factor Portfolio was 34.94%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 106 trading sessions.

The current Multi-Factor Portfolio drawdown is 2.15%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-34.94%Mar 2020
1mo 2d5mo 1d
6mo 3dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020
Bear market2022
-26.30%Sep 2022
10mo 25d1y 3mo
2y 2moNov 2021 - Jan 2024
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-19.98%Dec 2018
2mo 21d4mo 7d
6mo 28dOct 2018 - Apr 2019
2025 selloff2025
-17.92%Apr 2025
1mo 17d2mo 17d
4mo 4dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025
2016 correction2016
-11.33%Feb 2016
2mo 11d1mo 20d
4mo 1dDec 2015 - Apr 2016

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


The gist

The portfolio is a compact bet on U.S. large-cap factor equity, with quality and momentum doing most of the work and value, size, and low volatility mostly changing the texture around the edges.

The numbers

  • Diversification ratio is 1.06 over inception and 1.13 over 1Y, both around the 11th-20th percentile on the platform; that is a portfolio with some diversification benefit, but not much.
  • Effective asset count is 3.64 of 5, so the weights are spread out, though the correlations say the holdings still behave like one sleeve.
  • Pairwise correlations run 0.69-0.84, and the whole set sits in one cluster, which is what factor portfolios do when the factors are all from the same neighborhood.

The good

  • The portfolio is internally coherent: Momentum (MTUM), Quality (QUAL), Value (VLUE), Size (SIZE), and Min Volatility (USMV) are distinct labels for a fairly similar U.S. equity engine.
  • The weights are not mechanically concentrated in one name, so the construction avoids single-fund idiosyncrasy.
  • To be fair, the 1Y DR is a bit better than the long-run figure, so the sleeves have recently been less perfectly redundant than they were over longer windows.

The bad

  • QUAL at 35% and MTUM at 35% dominate the portfolio-to-portfolio correlation picture, at 0.96 and 0.93, so the portfolio is closer to a factor blend than a diversified mix.
  • SIZE, VLUE, and USMV are useful decorators, but their correlations with the rest stay high enough that they do not create much independent return path.

The ugly

  • If U.S. large-cap factors de-rate together, the portfolio’s entire correlation structure tends to travel as one object; the “diversification” mostly survives only in the arithmetic.

Next steps

  • Portfolios with this correlation profile are often paired with exposures whose earnings drivers sit outside the U.S. equity factor complex.
  • A sleeve with materially different macro sensitivity would change the portfolio more than another U.S. factor ETF pretending to be a different idea.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.64, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.13

1.08

1.07

1.06

1.06

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.06, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

Multi-Factor Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Multi-Factor Portfolio has a 0.92 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013

0.96


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. QUAL has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.96, while USMV has the lowest at 0.83.

USMV
0.83
VLUE
0.84
SIZE
0.84
MTUM
0.86
QUAL
0.96

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Multi-Factor Portfolio. QUAL has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.96, while USMV has the lowest at 0.83.

USMV
0.83
VLUE
0.84
SIZE
0.86
MTUM
0.93
QUAL
0.96

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

USMVVLUEMTUMSIZEQUAL
USMV1.000.700.720.770.83
VLUE0.701.000.690.840.81
MTUM0.720.691.000.710.83
SIZE0.770.840.711.000.84
QUAL0.830.810.830.841.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 18, 2013
Diversification Analysis

Find what Multi-Factor Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Multi-Factor Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification