PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Lucas Lemos
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


^NDX 50.00%^GSPC 50.00%EquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
50%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
50%

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Lucas Lemos, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 25, 1985, corresponding to the inception date of ^NDX

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the Lucas Lemos returned -4.40% Year-To-Date and 15.27% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.72%-3.54%-3.95%-2.09%15.95%16.96%10.34%12.24%
Portfolio
Lucas Lemos
0.95%-3.18%-4.40%-2.79%19.31%19.59%11.53%15.27%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
1.18%-3.89%-4.87%-3.15%23.58%22.14%12.50%18.15%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
0.72%-4.45%-3.95%-2.02%16.73%16.96%10.34%12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 26, 1985, Lucas Lemos's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +1.09%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.3 years.

Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Dec 1999 with a return of +15.9%, while the worst month was Oct 1987 at -24.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 12 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, Lucas Lemos closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +12.1%, while the worst single day was Oct 19, 1987 at -17.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.28%-1.59%-4.99%0.95%-4.40%
20252.46%-2.09%-6.72%0.37%7.61%5.63%2.27%1.38%4.46%3.52%-0.76%-0.39%18.33%
20241.72%5.23%2.13%-4.31%5.54%4.83%-0.25%1.70%2.25%-0.92%5.48%-1.05%24.15%
20238.40%-1.53%6.57%0.98%3.92%6.48%3.46%-1.70%-4.97%-2.14%9.80%4.97%38.55%
2022-6.88%-3.87%3.89%-11.08%-0.80%-8.70%10.83%-4.74%-9.97%5.97%5.42%-7.45%-26.40%
2021-0.41%1.24%2.85%5.56%-0.36%4.28%2.53%3.53%-5.25%7.41%0.49%2.72%26.84%

Benchmark Metrics

Lucas Lemos has an annualized alpha of 2.07%, beta of 1.09, and R² of 0.89 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 26, 1985.

  • This portfolio captured 122.68% of S&P 500 Index gains and 109.83% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.07% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.09 and R² of 0.89, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
2.07%
Beta
1.09
0.89
Upside Capture
122.68%
Downside Capture
109.83%

Expense Ratio

Lucas Lemos has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Lucas Lemos ranks 34 for risk / return — below 34% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Lucas Lemos Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
Lucas Lemos Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Lucas Lemos Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
Lucas Lemos Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
Lucas Lemos Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
Lucas Lemos Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.92

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

1.41

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.41

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.14

6.61

+0.52


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
761.041.621.231.937.05
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
670.921.411.211.416.61

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Lucas Lemos Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.99
  • 5-Year: 0.59
  • 10-Year: 0.77
  • All Time: 0.57

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Lucas Lemos compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield


Lucas Lemos doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Lucas Lemos. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Lucas Lemos was 69.09%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 2820 trading sessions.

The current Lucas Lemos drawdown is 6.73%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-69.09%Mar 28, 2000636Oct 9, 20022820Dec 20, 20133456
-35.78%Aug 26, 198771Dec 4, 1987377Jun 2, 1989448
-30.82%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202072Jul 6, 202095
-30.46%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022295Dec 18, 2023497
-26.51%Jul 17, 199062Oct 11, 199084Feb 11, 1991146

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

Benchmark^NDX^GSPCPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.841.000.93
^NDX0.841.000.840.97
^GSPC1.000.841.000.93
Portfolio0.930.970.931.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 26, 1985