Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 50% | |
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 50% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Lucas Lemos, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 25, 1985, corresponding to the inception date of ^NDX
Returns By Period
As of Apr 2, 2026, the Lucas Lemos returned -4.40% Year-To-Date and 15.27% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.72% | -3.54% | -3.95% | -2.09% | 15.95% | 16.96% | 10.34% | 12.24% |
Portfolio Lucas Lemos | 0.95% | -3.18% | -4.40% | -2.79% | 19.31% | 19.59% | 11.53% | 15.27% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 1.18% | -3.89% | -4.87% | -3.15% | 23.58% | 22.14% | 12.50% | 18.15% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 0.72% | -4.45% | -3.95% | -2.02% | 16.73% | 16.96% | 10.34% | 12.24% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 26, 1985, Lucas Lemos's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +1.09%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.3 years.
Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Dec 1999 with a return of +15.9%, while the worst month was Oct 1987 at -24.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 12 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.
On a daily basis, Lucas Lemos closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +12.1%, while the worst single day was Oct 19, 1987 at -17.7%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.28% | -1.59% | -4.99% | 0.95% | -4.40% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2.46% | -2.09% | -6.72% | 0.37% | 7.61% | 5.63% | 2.27% | 1.38% | 4.46% | 3.52% | -0.76% | -0.39% | 18.33% |
| 2024 | 1.72% | 5.23% | 2.13% | -4.31% | 5.54% | 4.83% | -0.25% | 1.70% | 2.25% | -0.92% | 5.48% | -1.05% | 24.15% |
| 2023 | 8.40% | -1.53% | 6.57% | 0.98% | 3.92% | 6.48% | 3.46% | -1.70% | -4.97% | -2.14% | 9.80% | 4.97% | 38.55% |
| 2022 | -6.88% | -3.87% | 3.89% | -11.08% | -0.80% | -8.70% | 10.83% | -4.74% | -9.97% | 5.97% | 5.42% | -7.45% | -26.40% |
| 2021 | -0.41% | 1.24% | 2.85% | 5.56% | -0.36% | 4.28% | 2.53% | 3.53% | -5.25% | 7.41% | 0.49% | 2.72% | 26.84% |
Benchmark Metrics
Lucas Lemos has an annualized alpha of 2.07%, beta of 1.09, and R² of 0.89 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 26, 1985.
- This portfolio captured 122.68% of S&P 500 Index gains and 109.83% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.07% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- With beta of 1.09 and R² of 0.89, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 2.07%
- Beta
- 1.09
- R²
- 0.89
- Upside Capture
- 122.68%
- Downside Capture
- 109.83%
Expense Ratio
Lucas Lemos has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Lucas Lemos ranks 34 for risk / return — below 34% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.92 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.41 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.41 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 6.61 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 76 | 1.04 | 1.62 | 1.23 | 1.93 | 7.05 |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 67 | 0.92 | 1.41 | 1.21 | 1.41 | 6.61 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Lucas Lemos. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Lucas Lemos was 69.09%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 2820 trading sessions.
The current Lucas Lemos drawdown is 6.73%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -69.09% | Mar 28, 2000 | 636 | Oct 9, 2002 | 2820 | Dec 20, 2013 | 3456 |
| -35.78% | Aug 26, 1987 | 71 | Dec 4, 1987 | 377 | Jun 2, 1989 | 448 |
| -30.82% | Feb 20, 2020 | 23 | Mar 23, 2020 | 72 | Jul 6, 2020 | 95 |
| -30.46% | Dec 28, 2021 | 202 | Oct 14, 2022 | 295 | Dec 18, 2023 | 497 |
| -26.51% | Jul 17, 1990 | 62 | Oct 11, 1990 | 84 | Feb 11, 1991 | 146 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | ^NDX | ^GSPC | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| ^NDX | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| ^GSPC | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| Portfolio | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.00 |