Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | Precious Metals | 33% |
SXR8.DE iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | S&P 500 | 67% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in naesez, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 16, 2021, corresponding to the inception date of PPFB.DE
Returns By Period
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.72% | -3.54% | -3.95% | -2.09% | 15.95% | 16.96% | 10.34% | 12.24% |
Portfolio naesez | 2.43% | -4.45% | -0.06% | 6.73% | 28.74% | 24.06% | — | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
SXR8.DE iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.07% | -3.85% | -4.27% | -1.10% | 18.40% | 18.70% | 11.76% | 13.87% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.17% | -9.77% | 8.53% | 23.47% | 52.70% | 34.08% | — | — |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 19, 2021, naesez's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.18%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.9 years.
Historically, 74% of months were positive and 26% were negative. The best month was Nov 2023 with a return of +6.4%, while the worst month was Mar 2026 at -8.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 12 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, naesez closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 10, 2025 with a return of +5.5%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -4.3%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.47% | 1.57% | -8.06% | 2.43% | -0.06% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 4.59% | -1.75% | 0.04% | 1.38% | 4.44% | 3.76% | 1.71% | 2.33% | 5.96% | 3.28% | 1.89% | 2.13% | 33.86% |
| 2024 | 1.08% | 2.89% | 5.06% | -1.05% | 2.44% | 3.66% | 1.74% | 1.95% | 3.40% | 1.67% | 2.60% | -2.33% | 25.47% |
| 2023 | 5.59% | -2.99% | 4.65% | 1.39% | 0.52% | 3.26% | 2.89% | -1.06% | -4.51% | 0.43% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 21.92% |
| 2022 | -4.48% | 0.54% | 3.72% | -5.63% | -2.61% | -5.92% | 4.91% | -2.96% | -6.20% | 3.12% | 4.76% | -1.60% | -12.58% |
| 2021 | 1.09% | 1.88% | -3.52% | 4.13% | 0.41% | 3.09% | 7.10% |
Benchmark Metrics
naesez has an annualized alpha of 10.20%, beta of 0.39, and R² of 0.27 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 19, 2021.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (81.48%) than losses (62.80%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- Beta of 0.39 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.27 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R² of 0.27 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 10.20%
- Beta
- 0.39
- R²
- 0.27
- Upside Capture
- 81.48%
- Downside Capture
- 62.80%
Expense Ratio
naesez has an expense ratio of 0.12%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
naesez ranks 83 for risk / return — in the top 83% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 0.92 | +1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 1.41 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.41 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 6.61 | +5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXR8.DE iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 65 | 1.08 | 1.58 | 1.23 | 1.92 | 8.27 |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 87 | 2.03 | 2.52 | 1.36 | 3.05 | 11.71 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the naesez. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the naesez was 19.09%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 190 trading sessions.
The current naesez drawdown is 7.21%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -19.09% | Jan 6, 2022 | 200 | Oct 14, 2022 | 190 | Jul 13, 2023 | 390 |
| -11.78% | Feb 21, 2025 | 34 | Apr 9, 2025 | 16 | May 6, 2025 | 50 |
| -10.63% | Jan 29, 2026 | 42 | Mar 27, 2026 | — | — | — |
| -7.4% | Jul 20, 2023 | 54 | Oct 3, 2023 | 36 | Nov 22, 2023 | 90 |
| -6.07% | Jul 17, 2024 | 14 | Aug 5, 2024 | 11 | Aug 20, 2024 | 25 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.79, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | PPFB.DE | SXR8.DE | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.64 | 0.57 |
| PPFB.DE | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.14 | 0.55 |
| SXR8.DE | 0.64 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| Portfolio | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.87 | 1.00 |