PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAC Mao
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


CSSPX.MI 60.00%RHM.DE 40.00%EquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
CSSPX.MI
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
S&P 500
60%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
Industrials
40%

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in PAC Mao, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 27, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of CSSPX.MI

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the PAC Mao returned -1.89% Year-To-Date and 28.27% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
PAC Mao
-0.97%-1.63%-1.89%-18.76%26.82%58.95%44.66%28.27%
CSSPX.MI
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.28%-3.20%-4.61%-1.68%17.28%18.22%11.69%13.82%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
-1.15%-1.24%-1.19%-22.12%29.43%84.02%79.27%39.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 28, 2010, PAC Mao's average daily return is +0.09%, while the average monthly return is +1.85%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 3.2 years.

Historically, 59% of months were positive and 41% were negative. The best month was Mar 2025 with a return of +25.0%, while the worst month was Sep 2011 at -15.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 13 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, PAC Mao closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 3, 2025 with a return of +11.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -9.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
202612.09%-5.72%-13.35%7.14%-1.89%
202514.78%20.65%25.04%14.87%23.06%0.05%-4.94%-0.06%15.28%-12.67%-10.10%5.56%122.26%
20246.72%17.72%14.40%-2.38%4.13%-4.64%4.32%6.28%-4.83%-2.73%18.15%-2.50%64.72%
202310.54%3.38%9.50%0.14%-5.68%7.24%3.24%-2.28%-4.92%3.49%6.93%5.10%41.41%
2022-2.98%9.73%17.00%-1.91%-5.24%1.33%-5.36%-7.02%-5.74%5.30%11.35%-3.00%10.67%
2021-0.26%0.33%3.27%4.42%0.96%0.51%1.21%2.80%-2.97%4.11%-1.58%4.50%18.36%

Benchmark Metrics

PAC Mao has an annualized alpha of 12.90%, beta of 0.59, and R² of 0.20 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 28, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 109.77% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 78.56% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • Beta of 0.59 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.20 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.20 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
12.90%
Beta
0.59
0.20
Upside Capture
109.77%
Downside Capture
78.56%

Expense Ratio

PAC Mao has an expense ratio of 0.04%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

PAC Mao ranks 13 for risk / return — in the bottom 13% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


PAC Mao Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PAC Mao Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC Mao Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC Mao Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC Mao Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC Mao Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.88

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.37

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.39

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.99

6.43

-4.45


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
CSSPX.MI
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
571.021.511.221.857.87
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
570.621.131.140.681.63

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

PAC Mao Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.67
  • 5-Year: 1.58
  • 10-Year: 1.17
  • All Time: 0.95

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of PAC Mao compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

PAC Mao provided a 0.21% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.21%0.21%0.37%0.60%0.71%0.96%2.22%0.82%0.88%0.55%0.69%0.20%
CSSPX.MI
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
0.52%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%5.54%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the PAC Mao. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the PAC Mao was 38.58%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. Recovery took 169 trading sessions.

The current PAC Mao drawdown is 18.80%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-38.58%Jan 21, 202043Mar 19, 2020169Nov 16, 2020212
-35.4%Jul 8, 201163Oct 4, 2011499Sep 18, 2013562
-27.38%Apr 22, 2022126Oct 14, 202285Feb 13, 2023211
-27.23%Sep 30, 2025124Mar 27, 2026
-22.85%Jan 29, 2018233Dec 27, 2018130Jul 4, 2019363

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.92, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkRHM.DECSSPX.MIPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.330.580.48
RHM.DE0.331.000.430.89
CSSPX.MI0.580.431.000.73
Portfolio0.480.890.731.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 28, 2010