PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
big banks
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in big banks, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 4, 1999, corresponding to the inception date of GS

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the big banks returned -5.90% Year-To-Date and 18.99% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
big banks
0.05%0.78%-5.90%9.03%43.81%39.69%23.20%18.99%
C
Citigroup Inc.
-0.04%4.05%-0.72%19.73%64.78%39.92%13.43%13.92%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-0.26%-1.89%-8.16%-3.31%22.30%34.44%16.83%20.51%
MS
Morgan Stanley
-0.22%-0.08%-6.09%8.01%42.75%28.06%19.99%24.27%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
0.33%0.05%-1.30%11.87%56.44%41.69%24.33%20.98%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
0.04%-2.34%-13.09%1.15%13.96%32.15%17.98%8.19%
BBVA
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
0.46%4.98%-5.96%17.02%67.58%54.76%41.13%19.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 5, 1999, big banks's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.01%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.7 years.

Historically, 58% of months were positive and 42% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +32.0%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -28.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 7 months.

On a daily basis, big banks closed higher 52% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 24, 2008 with a return of +24.2%, while the worst single day was Jan 20, 2009 at -18.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.77%-7.02%-1.70%1.17%-5.90%
202513.22%1.46%-7.57%-0.01%9.29%9.97%4.38%4.29%5.10%1.69%3.36%7.32%64.66%
20241.79%4.25%10.33%-1.83%4.51%-1.40%5.43%0.80%-1.71%5.86%11.76%-3.68%40.96%
202312.24%1.07%-10.20%5.37%-5.33%6.59%7.16%-7.29%-1.03%-4.85%14.69%9.63%27.43%
20223.50%-6.09%-5.56%-8.23%7.80%-13.52%8.97%-1.27%-8.42%14.54%10.24%-6.56%-8.71%
2021-1.69%17.21%3.26%6.26%8.23%-2.53%0.43%5.66%-2.35%6.14%-10.08%1.52%33.90%

Benchmark Metrics

big banks has an annualized alpha of 3.08%, beta of 1.42, and R² of 0.68 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 05, 1999.

  • This portfolio captured 154.23% of S&P 500 Index gains and 129.20% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 3.08% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
3.08%
Beta
1.42
0.68
Upside Capture
154.23%
Downside Capture
129.20%

Expense Ratio

big banks has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

big banks ranks 75 for risk / return — better than 75% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


big banks Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
big banks Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
big banks Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
big banks Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
big banks Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
big banks Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

0.88

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

1.37

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.39

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.84

6.43

+2.41


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
C
Citigroup Inc.
871.972.381.363.5611.59
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
670.891.281.181.514.05
MS
Morgan Stanley
791.411.901.282.507.71
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
851.772.301.333.129.83
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
540.480.811.110.682.09
BBVA
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
861.972.461.343.129.94

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

big banks Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.69
  • 5-Year: 0.96
  • 10-Year: 0.69
  • All Time: 0.27

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of big banks compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

big banks provided a 2.35% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.35%2.13%3.28%3.46%3.76%2.27%2.94%2.99%3.24%2.29%2.39%2.17%
C
Citigroup Inc.
2.05%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.97%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.37%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.80%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
2.17%1.82%2.14%2.64%2.66%1.25%4.04%3.57%3.56%2.54%2.75%2.71%
BBVA
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
3.73%3.51%7.71%5.51%6.29%2.79%3.50%5.23%5.75%5.17%6.02%4.29%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the big banks. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the big banks was 75.49%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1570 trading sessions.

The current big banks drawdown is 10.36%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-75.49%May 21, 2007454Mar 9, 20091570Jun 3, 20152024
-51.46%Sep 12, 2000520Oct 9, 2002547Dec 10, 20041067
-50.84%Jan 30, 2018540Mar 23, 2020206Jan 14, 2021746
-34.56%Jul 23, 2015141Feb 11, 2016207Dec 6, 2016348
-32.43%Nov 2, 2021175Jul 14, 2022357Dec 13, 2023532

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBBVAWFCGSCMSJPMPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.580.620.680.670.690.680.77
BBVA0.581.000.480.490.520.500.520.69
WFC0.620.481.000.620.690.630.720.80
GS0.680.490.621.000.690.800.710.85
C0.670.520.690.691.000.720.740.86
MS0.690.500.630.800.721.000.720.87
JPM0.680.520.720.710.740.721.000.86
Portfolio0.770.690.800.850.860.870.861.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 5, 1999